Recent content by Thelitigator

Thanks Des

My question is primarily a theoretical one for peace of mind. I am curious of whether or not obligations like that survive a default with a new judgment ordered.

Do you have an opinion on the matter Quincy?

Im asking if obligations to not make disparaging comments about the debtor is still in effect after the debtor defaulted on the court approved stipulated judgment. Does the new judgment approved by the court supersede the prior agreement that was in default by the debtor?

yes, defaulted in a stipulated judgment adversary proceeding.. It's the Central district california court.

The debtor in a chapter 7 bankruptcy case has defaulted and the court has approved a new judgment lodged with the court. I would like to know if obligations stipulated by both parties remains in effect after the debtor defaulted and documented with the court if those provisions are not in the...

I hired legal counsel to help guide me through much of the process in the adversary proceeding up until receiving the stipulated judgment but I have not sought legal representation for this one particular matter. I have found this online that may be at least partially relevant to my...

bump...?

Quincy, what i would like to know is besides filing an affidavit of non compliance with the court, is there anything else that needs to be filed to have the full enforcement powers for bank levies or garnishment of wages for defaulting on the stipulated judgment to collect on the full judgment...

A debtor has breached a stipulated judgment in a chapter 7 adversary proceeding by failing to make a payment on time. A certified breach letter was sent to the debtor as directed in the stipulated judgment. The certified letter was attempted to be delivered to the address that was specified in...

The language gets rather messy when using the 'neither plaintiff nor defendant' describing contact with each other's mother and extended family. It makes it confusing as to whether or not one would be able to still have contact with one's own extended family and mother without additional...

I have a question about a clause in the stipulated agreement that the plaintiff is to not do a laundry list of communication towards the defendant. After all of this, it says one line that the obligations are mutual for both parties. Would the way that it's written cause a judge to be biased...

The opposing counsel has expressed that is the case. :)

I would think it's a filing in bad faith to go forward with it.

would mutual waivers apply to this? This is only a tentative agreement. No formal agreements have been signed yet. I would think it's a filing in bad faith to go forward with it.