Recent content by trwthlark

At the time, I didn't know that opinion/fact issue is a major problem in jurisprudence. The locked question had little to do with jurisprudence per se (hope the speliing is right this time). No need to even mention what importance the opinion/fact issue has in today's political milieu. I can't...

My bad. Typo.

Of course, it's not the purpose of this forum to judge. As far as I understand, the purpose of the forum is to help people in finding ways for the truth, the good, the just to prevail. What are the way to establish that something is a fact and not an opinion? That's the purpose of my OP.

While one may understand why an attorney may not take up such case (that's why I asked in my OP about per se), the magnitude of the imagined issue's importance with regard to the national interest cannot even be determined independently through referring it to a media outlet. There is no way to...

I've tried both to no avail. What do I do?

So, what's your suggestion?

How do you mean? Shouldn't the ``tone'' be mutually respectful?

Obviously, the question is not a class assignment because it seeks advice about legal actions concerning the US Supreme Court in practical terms. Was the locked question connected with legal actions concerning the US Supreme Court, let alone practical such actions? Besides, I am asking advice...

What is the name of your state? What is the name of your state? What is the name of your state? New York I'm reading in ``The Fact/Opinion Distinction: An Analysis of the Subjectivity of Language and Law'' by Michaele Sanders that the US Supreme Court has concluded that: ``Under the Fist...

Maybe true but we should do what we can to improve the situation, don't you think?

This, of course, is the easy way out. However, this is not my personal problem and it is unseemly regarding the public interest if this is let go. If significant issues such as this are left unattended it is a sure recipe for disaster. I don't know about you but I don't want my taxpayer dollar...

Undoubtedly. I have the highest qualifications and, as you can see, my argument is unequivocal. Think about it, the fact that I'm ready to appear before the US Congress shows how serious I am about this matter.

Good suggestion but I've already tried it to no avail. Not only is my Congressman not dealing with science but his policy in not to meet with individual constituents. An email to him didn't help either.

OK, let me try it, then. The sentence which needs to be included in the US Congress legislation is the following: ``No science project which is a candidate for public funding, should contain Lorentz transformations in any way, shape or form." The easiest way to see that Lorentz...

The issue is far more important to the USA than NRA and is by no means anything secretive but I just don't want to divert the conversation into discussing it, which will be inevitable. I just need to understand the principle of how to proceed. How to hire a lobbyist is something pretty unclear...