FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.
I think I remember that too.
I'm not sure why YOU thought it was okay to merge into another lane without yielding to a car already in that lane. You had no right to be "let in", rather it was your responsibility to yield the right-of-way to other traffic when you changed lanes, regardless of...
I wish I would have known all this 15 years ago. I locked up a guy in for a DWI in NY. A license check showed a prior DUI in NJ but since his criminal history showed nothing the ADA didn't want to charge him based on a prior conviction and instead charged him as a first timer.
Good. Then mind your business and let your lovely neighbor deal with her own legal problems. Hopefully she learned a lesson and will do things differently when her new car gets repossessed.
So you're really, really sorry but suddenly it's unfair and you're looking for a technicality to get off on. I see.
This matter is best discussed with your retained legal counsel.
If one of the other involved (or more than one) now claims injuries he could have some legal issues for quite a while and if there is any substantial judgment against him he could be affected for a very long time. Worst case, of course.
Everyone can swear anything they want - since no one had insurance it can simply be a huge mess.
Just curious - did she know the car was not insured when she took it? Why was your car not insured? You could potentially be paying for this for the rest of your life.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.