FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.
Feedback was for CBG, JB, not you. If you slow down and reread what I wrote for you, it was a thank you. More specifically for bringing Quincy and company into the discussion. Have you considered decaf?
And based on what I've learned from this thread today, a more refined talk track that can fit within a 5-15 minute window so the attorney has an opportunity to understand, assess, digest and get prescriptive. Which we will work on after I have the opportunity to walk her through what I have...
So the logical math I'm doing is telling me that while, informally, compensatory damages must equal x to trigger a valid, punitive discussion. So if she was permanently disabled and her compensatory expenses were say $100k then that figure makes the punitive soil more fertile. Loosely translated...
Thank you Quincy. Although I have never taken the bar, a large part of my professional role for the past 20 years is to work with our corporate attorneys on crafting large RFX responses to government contract opportunities. So while I may not be formally licensed myself, I am well beyond day one...
Thank you very much for your response, a conversation and understanding is all I have been asking for here. I had a similar conversation with her highlighting some of your points when it happened. Priority one at the time, getting her calm and relaxed. She wasn't out of control by any means but...
That is the nicest thing you have said CBG, thank you. JB - if he wanted his name or alias to be visible then he wouldn't have messaged me privately, would he? Guess what, I won't offer it for the same reasons he didn't - he's avoiding the trolls. Can't say I blame him. As for your comment about...
Additionally, with the exception of one individual responding privately, the responses I have been given here have been obnoxious, impatient, immature, and highly prescriptive without anyone asking questions and doing proper due diligence. So I can see why the T's and C's mention the"legal...
Frankly, it doesn't matter what I or you think the proper inspection frequency is. The law does / should have the responsibility of providing a reasonable definition that would answer your question. You're the attorney, so why don't you tell me; how does the law answer that question?
Hi Gail. On the compensatory side, yes, trivial costs. On the other side, and this is where my "additional information" comment from before comes in. There are several things we are finding here that are unacceptable and at least in our learnings of the law are illegal and a number of safety...
Love the candor, thank you. Wish I got more of that from my coworkers. From an employment attorney perspective, thank you for the insight.
JB - thanks for the website. I'll take a look. I'm leaving this thread open however for anyone else, who hopefully, is more knowledgeable on this...
JB - I know, nobody has more respect for my fiance than I do. I'm a careless handful at times.
Thanks for chiming in CBG. Again, I agree with all of you on the "lawsuit lottery" point and frankly, so does she. Deromanticizing this story for a moment, we have laughable expenses from this...
Of course not, I'm a typical Joe in many ways but smart enough not to shop black Friday. Irregardless however of whatever nonsense nomenclature is buried in the T's & C's, this site is no different than a chatroom with voluntary participants. So what more is there to know?
Lol you sound my kind of people, you remind me a lot of my grandmother.
With that out of the way, I wouldn't invest my time into writing this nonsense if I didn't value your inputs. However, this is a government claim so expecting a little passion and prejudice from a community that works on...
Thank you both for your candor. I agree with you both, she should have watched where she was walking and when the heat of the moment had lapsed, I told her the same thing. Now, despite the tone my post implies, the "legal lottery" is a potential perk of the situation that frankly, while we would...
Hi folks. Before my fiance and I begin interviewing attorneys, we want to socialize our story to better understand if we have enough to pursue, despite us feeling like we do. We live in an apartment community in Gwinnett County, GA. Looks good from a prospective resident perspective but the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.