FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.
But, you'll never know for sure since you allowed them inside.
I suspect there was more than merely a respirator that prompted their response. More than likely there was also a chemical odor of some kind as well. Such matters can grant the exigency that allows for a warrantless entry. You...
I was going to say the same thing. While I was never an instructor, and am not a member of the NRA, their firearms training programs appeared to be good, effective, and possessed zero politics in it, which is a far cry from most the social programs contracted to outside organizations within the...
Re: range training for officers, this varies greatly by state and by department. In a state where we now see officers confronting handgun-armed criminals with Tasers (yes, it's happened twice in the last few weeks that we know of), and city councils cutting back expenditures in ammunition and...
A small child (immature, often acting without forethought, etc.) carrying a phony firearm is a recipe for disaster, NOT safety!
I am all for LAWFUL carry by trained and properly certified individuals, but this post was asking about a child carrying an imitation firearm.
Though, he minimizes accidental discovery and unfortunate and tragic consequences by not carrying it in such a manner in the first place. It would not be the first time that a child or adult made a stupid move while handling an imitation firearm leading to tragic consequences. Even LEGALLY...
Carrying a concealed firearm - even an imitation firearm - is a good way to get dead, even if carried by a kid,. Any parent that would allow their child to sport a concealed weapon of any kind should be flogged!
Well, you DID say you would be "filing charges" against "them" without defining who "them" might be, or what sort of charges you think could be filed. Thus, people were asking for clarification since no crime appears to be committed and a tort might be hard to identify and pursue.
I'm simply befuddled as to why there would be no collision report with this. I find it hard to believe that some teenager INTENTIONALLY rammed a bunch of cars in the commission of multiple cases of felony vandalism. This is peculiar.
@replicationspork, how long ago did this occur? Keep in...
Not to mention that filing "charges" implies CRIMINAL charges. I don't see that a criminal case can be made here. Making a claim for damages and filing a lawsuit would be about the money, but, absent quantifiable damages, I don't know that this would even get in the door. Not to mention that...
The only way that there would not be a collision report with this investigation would be if the impacts were all intentional acts and the kid was being charged with vandalism or ADW or something similar. Absent intentionally ramming the parked vehicles, it would be both a crime for the bad...
Not assuming you have a big mouth, but I have yet to meet ANYONE who has a complaint about an ex and their children who does not tell someone - usually several someones. And if that someone tells someone it just balloons on and on. And since the two of you likely have a few friends and family...
Whether or not the ex SHOULD have known something does not mean that someone leaked any confidential info. There are always numerous ways to find out something like this over time. Especially since you probably told people about your complaint to CPS, there is just as likely a chance that the...
If you have not been contacting CPS in the past 7 years, then how can anyone be providing information that you have? Did you lie about that?
As for getting more info, don't count on it. Internal personnel matters are largely confidential. You might be able to learn that an investigation is...
The local police would likely not have a clue as to what any criminal code section for this might be under the ADA, nor would they know how to file the matter in Federal Court. In your case, the police responded to a complaint of a violation of state or local law. State and local law, they...
PC 243(a) is the penalty section for misdemeanor battery per PC 242.
While the law does not specifically permit battery against someone refusing to leave their property when requested, there may be articulated circumstances that might provide some measure of justification. He may be claiming...
It is likely that the store owners asked to have you arrested. Under California Penal Code 837, if a party wishes to make a private person's arrest, an officer has to accept the arrest. In this case, since battery is a misdemeanor pursuant to PC 242, you were issued a notice to appear for the...
Since it's California, I'll lay odds that it's 1 in 10 that something will be done. But, these odds can change if the texter is local or known to local cops.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.