FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.
Let's see ... drinking from a large can or bottle (32 oz? 40 oz? Distinct shape?) in a paper or plastic bag? In my experience these are almost always weak attempts to conceal alcohol. I can count on one hand in 27 years the number of times someone was drinking NON-alcohol in such a manner...
Proposition 47 was a wide-ranging set of laws that was part of the parade of ill-advised and poorly considered "reforms" in CA. So, yes, these laws are applicable even in San Diego.
What, exactly, are you asking about?
The definition of what it means to yield can vary by court. In some courts, they will decide that you have to yield while the pedestrian is anywhere in the crosswalk. Others may be okay with their simply being no reasonable likelihood of impact (say, half the distance across and away from the...
Essentially, yes. Though, I have heard it referred to as the "fellow officer rule" as opposed to "doctrine." But, in the case of a citation, the arresting officer will also be listed along with the citing officer.
In CA we have spaces on the citation for two officers: One for the "arresting...
Okay ... care to provide some additional details?
This appears to be an Orange County Parking violation.
2-1-52(k)7:
No person shall park a motor vehicle at any place on the Airport in violation of any sign posted by the Airport Director.
So, it appears you are accused of parking in violation...
OP stated there was no other officer at the scene. And, out here, if an officer is in FTO, they are issuing and signing their own cites unless they did not witness the offense. However, if this offense was observed by one officer and the issuing officer was not the same as the arresting (i.e...
Yep ... I sense he was like that with responding officers and managed to talk his way into an arrest for obstructing or resisting, or something akin to that. Only his attorney will be able to say whether the charges are likely to stick or not as we don't have any real facts.
You were arrested? What were you charged with?
Wow ... foul mouth much? Maybe it was your mouth that got you into trouble that night. If you were arrested for obstruction or some similar offense, your actions may have been why.
Sometimes posters get sidetracked ... like in any real life...
Any consideration of a potential 4th Amendment issue has to be evaluated based upon the articulated facts at the moment. Each situation is different and must be evaluated based upon its own merits. Since you posted no facts, about all one might be able to say is ... Yes, there are...
Was there another officer with the citing officer?
It could be there were two officers in the car, two officers on the stop, or, the issuing officer and the "arresting" officer were different people and that created the mix-up. Hard to imagine that an officer would forget their name and sign...
Again, I point out that threads here often take a tangent. NOWHERE have I stated that the poster should NOT be concerned or that CPS or the police should NOT be involved. However, I have also investigated a great many reports that were NOT what the complaining party said they were, so there is...
Ah, yes, because NO thread here has ever taken a turn into a tangent when the OP has not returned. :rolleyes:
I have probably dealt with more cases of burned children, abused children, and murdered children than anyone here, so please don't tell me what I think of such abuse or this particular...
And here I thought it was boys who developed such intimate relations with their doctors! :)
She sounds like the girls that my now-USMC son grew up playing with!
In what state did this happen?
As for burns and some sort of automatic CPS referral or police report, that's not necessarily so. If the doctor or the hospital suspects foul play, of course. But not every burn warrants a police investigation. I'd go so far as to say that most do not involve...
I don't see any exception for weekends or Holidays. But, there may be some exception or some nuance of the dates that is not obvious to those of us who are not privy to the actual search warrant.
https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CR/htm/CR.18.htm
If the time frame was, indeed, 3 days and that time frame was exceeded between the time the warrant was signed and executed, then your attorney can make a motion to suppress any evidence seized pursuant to the warrant. If the state has other evidence not obtained pursuant to items discovered as...
You can bring this to the attention of your attorney and MAYBE they can seek to exclude any evidence obtained through the search. Your attorney is in the best position to effectively evaluate the matter.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.