FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.
you could have quoted my entire thought process, instead of just one sentence. of course i know what "realized gain" is supposed to mean. i dont know what was meant by it in that particular trust.
this is what i said
i am not sure what is meant by "realized capital gain" ?
one way to...
i am not sure what is meant by "realized capital gain" ?
one way to interpret that is if an asset was actually sold, then there would be the basis to it plus a gain, if there was a gain.
it makes a lot more sense, if trust is just adding gain of a sold asset to the monthly distribution
i would need to read the trust to know for sure. but here is some feedback and maybe some educated guesses
1) assuming the beneficiaries are related, there is a step-up in basis when the grantor dies, so there is no capital gains at the time of inheritance
2) the trustee should get...
also, while you would probably do best to name just one individual, as trustee
it would not hurt to prepare a list of all the things that the trust owns
and give that list to several people that you trust
it is not that this list is legal, but it does give the beneficiaries a place to look...
what the heck are you saying, here ? it sounds very convoluted.
the op is absolutely correct - all he has to do is put his assets in a trust, and beneficiary has no legal means to know anything about it, while the op is alive. if that is what the op desires.
if possible, i would at least...
i do not like having financial institutions as trustee. i would suggest finding a financially savvy friend or acquaintance, that you feel is trustworthy.
this is what i would do, if i was in this situation. not that this is right for you, but it may at least give you something to think about...
or you could create a trust now, and keep it out of the probate system, entirely
since this trust is gonna exist beyond the death of the grantor (you), it would be wise not to do it yourself
all 3 posts are excellent advice.
just to add another 2 cents, if a house is priced correctly, it will sell. so obviously, yours is priced too high.
if the house is not gonna be marketed correctly, then it should be taken off the market, and rented, so that income can be made
vacant houses...
not correct about the distribution. it really all depends on how the trust is worded. since the exclusion is so high today, it wont affect many people.
the concept of the ab trust though, is not simply to avoid taxes.
another big concept is the ability for each grantor to specify who they...
many, if not most or all, institutions have different protocols for revocable and irrevocable trusts.
for example, it is difficult around here to open an account at a credit union for an irrevocable trust.
it seems likely to me that any transfer of funds from a pod designation is gonna happen...
i think we are using the word "bias" in different ways. the way you are using it, seems not to have much meaning, in that you are equating the words opinion and bias.
of course i have an opinion. when i use the word "bias", i am referring to an opinion that has something to do other than the...
there is not much that needs to be done with a document that merely distributes assets. that is a hidden truth that professionals do not want us peons to know.
i have seen many trusts that do a fine job. and one can start with that document, and make whatever changes are necessary. of course...
i am a big trust promoter, and i dont make a dime from it !!
most any free trust from the internet will do the job, if all you want is a WILL WITHOUT PROBATE
tod designations are often limited to just 1 person
within a trust, you can distribute to as many people as you want, and whatever...
agreed. if there are exceptions, i have never seen one. but the overwhelming percentage of grantor revocable trusts use the social security number of the grantor. and they typically are always funded. otherwise they do no good. a trust can only control assets that have been titled to it.
believe it or not, i actually agree with much of what you said, regarding your comparison
i stay away from both professions, and that is the last word from me, on the subject !!
there is one big difference between lawyers and doctors though - doctors did not create the human body, and all of its ailments
but their model to fix our ailments always revolves around expensive pharmaceuticals
in other words, the main goal of our medical society revolves around profit, not...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.