A
Andy104
Guest
What is the name of your state? Alaska
well below is the counseling i recieved that was sent to the company. I was out due to surgery on Friday however they still put a flag on me without me knowing it.
On 26 Jan 07 you brought your dog to the department staff meeting and the dog stayed with you until i told you to take the dog home at approximately 1400. During my conversation with you, you informed me that LTC **** granted you permission to have the dog at your place of duty. I ask LTC *** if this information was correct and we both came to you and he told you he never gave you permission that the dog could be in the building. And further more the dog could only come in pre-approved for a group therapy session and today (26 Jan 07) there was not a therapy session. This is in direct violation of Article 98 of the UCMJ. I than informed SFC *** of the situation and she told me that she verbally counseled you several times about the appropriateness of the dog presence in bldg 1064, which was the same as LTC *** guidance and the last time was just last week. 26 Jan was the first day of her convalescent leave so your behavior is unacceptable and in direct violation of Artical 91 of the UCMJ. On 31 Jan 07, you informed LTC *** that you recieved a threatening phone call, he instructed you to call the MP's. Ms.***** and Ms. *** informed me that you accused me of the threatening phone call which causes slander to my name, my position and rank, position and authority by your accusation and you are in violation of Article 89 of the UCMJ IAW AR 635-200 chapter 1-16;
Then there is the magic bullett.
Under the plan of action: Your actions are unprofessional and unethical not only as a NCO but as a Soldier in the US Army. I cannot have you working in a position of leadership in my department. I need soldiers that emulate the Army Values and do not require ongoing counseling and corrective training. I am forwarding this counseling to the command for UCMJ action and you will be transfered to work in a section of the hospital MSG ****, NCOIC DCCCS deems appropriate. You will report to her at 0800 tomorrow morning. You will turn in you keys immediatly to SFC *** and have your office cleaned out NLT 1630 this Friday 2 Feb 07.
Now i am attaching a few other things to the counseling, like some e-mails from LTC *** and a MEMO for record.
MEMO for Record: Today i was ordered by MAJ *** to take my therapy dog home and not bring her back, that she was only allowed to be in the clinic for groups. He also stated SFC **** had told me not to bring her back into the building. (SFC**** told me at one time that i was not to bring her to work everyday. I have never been told not to bring her totally.) Many of the staff on the secound floor find her very theraputic to themselves when she is in the clinic as they are able to use tactile stimulation to help relieve stress, enough can not be said for relieving stress while petting a dog.
Also i was confronted by MAJ *** wanting to know if i got specific permission from LTC *** to bring my dog in today. I stated no and he twisted what i had said before to basically make it out that i was lying. Also stating that doing rounds at the hospital was not part of my job over here and i would not be doing it. If i wanted to they would find me somewhere else to work.
well i have e-mail traffic where LTC **** states: (Please get with me and let me knw what the plan is) this is concerning the pet visitation. All he states in the e-mail _I do not want both dogs here at the same time and to get with each other and get with him to let him know what the plan is, nothing about not doing it!
now for my next MEMO of record
On 31 Jan 07 between 0800 and 0830 i recieved a threatening phone call on my awnsering machine. I contacted the secretary to listen and she advised me to call the MP's. I did this then notified LTC *** that i had done so. I went back to the front office and began brain storming with the secretary about who it could possibly be, because she knows the patient list we deal with. She ask me who is mad at me. I rattled off about 10 names and one of the happened to be MAJ **** who is the Chief of where i worked. This was just brain storming and not directed at any one person.
The MP arrived and took my statement, MAJ *** and LTC *** arrived at my door while the MP was here. MAJ **** ask me if i had told the secretary it was him who called and left the message. I stated his name had been mentioned, during the brain storming. He told me i was out of the place i worked and that i would be moved and that i would be seeing the CSM of the hospital today. I said yes sir and they left.
When the MP was finishing my statement MAJ *** came back and stated i needed to clear my schedule at 1400 today because SFC *** was coming in to counsel me. I said yes sir and he left. When i mentioned MAJ *** it was of someone whom i have had confrontation with in the last two weeks. Not as if he actually was the one treatening me. When i was brain storming i spoke out loud so i could hear the names and be able to process weather it was actually them or not. I did not accuse any one of wrong doing not even in the sworn statement to the MP's.
well that is it for now, i go see the commander Monday i am sure. Any advice. I would like to take this to courts martial i think.
well below is the counseling i recieved that was sent to the company. I was out due to surgery on Friday however they still put a flag on me without me knowing it.
On 26 Jan 07 you brought your dog to the department staff meeting and the dog stayed with you until i told you to take the dog home at approximately 1400. During my conversation with you, you informed me that LTC **** granted you permission to have the dog at your place of duty. I ask LTC *** if this information was correct and we both came to you and he told you he never gave you permission that the dog could be in the building. And further more the dog could only come in pre-approved for a group therapy session and today (26 Jan 07) there was not a therapy session. This is in direct violation of Article 98 of the UCMJ. I than informed SFC *** of the situation and she told me that she verbally counseled you several times about the appropriateness of the dog presence in bldg 1064, which was the same as LTC *** guidance and the last time was just last week. 26 Jan was the first day of her convalescent leave so your behavior is unacceptable and in direct violation of Artical 91 of the UCMJ. On 31 Jan 07, you informed LTC *** that you recieved a threatening phone call, he instructed you to call the MP's. Ms.***** and Ms. *** informed me that you accused me of the threatening phone call which causes slander to my name, my position and rank, position and authority by your accusation and you are in violation of Article 89 of the UCMJ IAW AR 635-200 chapter 1-16;
Then there is the magic bullett.
Under the plan of action: Your actions are unprofessional and unethical not only as a NCO but as a Soldier in the US Army. I cannot have you working in a position of leadership in my department. I need soldiers that emulate the Army Values and do not require ongoing counseling and corrective training. I am forwarding this counseling to the command for UCMJ action and you will be transfered to work in a section of the hospital MSG ****, NCOIC DCCCS deems appropriate. You will report to her at 0800 tomorrow morning. You will turn in you keys immediatly to SFC *** and have your office cleaned out NLT 1630 this Friday 2 Feb 07.
Now i am attaching a few other things to the counseling, like some e-mails from LTC *** and a MEMO for record.
MEMO for Record: Today i was ordered by MAJ *** to take my therapy dog home and not bring her back, that she was only allowed to be in the clinic for groups. He also stated SFC **** had told me not to bring her back into the building. (SFC**** told me at one time that i was not to bring her to work everyday. I have never been told not to bring her totally.) Many of the staff on the secound floor find her very theraputic to themselves when she is in the clinic as they are able to use tactile stimulation to help relieve stress, enough can not be said for relieving stress while petting a dog.
Also i was confronted by MAJ *** wanting to know if i got specific permission from LTC *** to bring my dog in today. I stated no and he twisted what i had said before to basically make it out that i was lying. Also stating that doing rounds at the hospital was not part of my job over here and i would not be doing it. If i wanted to they would find me somewhere else to work.
well i have e-mail traffic where LTC **** states: (Please get with me and let me knw what the plan is) this is concerning the pet visitation. All he states in the e-mail _I do not want both dogs here at the same time and to get with each other and get with him to let him know what the plan is, nothing about not doing it!
now for my next MEMO of record
On 31 Jan 07 between 0800 and 0830 i recieved a threatening phone call on my awnsering machine. I contacted the secretary to listen and she advised me to call the MP's. I did this then notified LTC *** that i had done so. I went back to the front office and began brain storming with the secretary about who it could possibly be, because she knows the patient list we deal with. She ask me who is mad at me. I rattled off about 10 names and one of the happened to be MAJ **** who is the Chief of where i worked. This was just brain storming and not directed at any one person.
The MP arrived and took my statement, MAJ *** and LTC *** arrived at my door while the MP was here. MAJ **** ask me if i had told the secretary it was him who called and left the message. I stated his name had been mentioned, during the brain storming. He told me i was out of the place i worked and that i would be moved and that i would be seeing the CSM of the hospital today. I said yes sir and they left.
When the MP was finishing my statement MAJ *** came back and stated i needed to clear my schedule at 1400 today because SFC *** was coming in to counsel me. I said yes sir and he left. When i mentioned MAJ *** it was of someone whom i have had confrontation with in the last two weeks. Not as if he actually was the one treatening me. When i was brain storming i spoke out loud so i could hear the names and be able to process weather it was actually them or not. I did not accuse any one of wrong doing not even in the sworn statement to the MP's.
well that is it for now, i go see the commander Monday i am sure. Any advice. I would like to take this to courts martial i think.