• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Is there a time limit?

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

pdpayne66

Junior Member
What is the name of your state? Texas

I am currently involved in a lawsuit with my ex-husband for several things. One, I am asking for a modification of child support.

Two, when we were divorced in May 2000, he was ordered to pay all of the credit cards (debts) but one. I took my one card and he took the rest. The particular card that is now in question was one to Partner's First with a balance of nearly $8000. He paid the payment until Sept 2002 and then when I took him to court because of non payment of child support (he was behind 3 months), he stopped paying the credit card. Of course, the credit card company came after me. During our proceedings in 2003 (when I finally got to court) the judge did tell him that he was responsible for the debt even though I brought him back to court. I didn't have that as part of my "motions" - but it is something my attorney brought up in court (I have a transcript of the court hearing).

He still did not pay. I have continued to pay the price by having my credit ruined and I have never been able to afford the attorney fees to take him back to court on this. Now, I am having to go to court because I tried to go through the Attorney General's Office for a modification of child support and he refused the "mediation" there. When I hired an attorney, I had them add in the papers to the court that we wanted him to pay the debt he originally had from our divorce.

Now, I just received a letter from the courts that is a "Dismissal Hearing Notice" and it says that "The court will dismiss the pending action for want of prosecution per rule 165A of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure unless there is good cause to maintain the case on the docket". I haven't been able to get a hold of my attorney and I was wondering if anyone knows anything about this?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.What is the name of your state?
 


JETX

Senior Member
Now, I just received a letter from the courts that is a "Dismissal Hearing Notice" and it says that "The court will dismiss the pending action for want of prosecution per rule 165A of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure unless there is good cause to maintain the case on the docket". I haven't been able to get a hold of my attorney
TRCP 165a DISMISSAL FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
1. Failure to Appear. A case may be dismissed for want of prosecution on failure of any party seeking affirmative relief to appear for any hearing or trial of which the party had notice. Notice of the court's intention to dismiss and the date and place of the dismissal hearing shall be sent by the clerk to each attorney of record, and to each party not represented by an attorney and whose address is shown on the docket or in the papers on file, by posting same in the United States Postal Service. At the dismissal hearing, the court shall dismiss for want of prosecution unless there is good cause for the case to be maintained on the docket. If the court determines to maintain the case on the docket, it shall render a pretrial order assigning a trial date for the case and setting deadlines for the joining of new parties, all discovery, Filing of all pleadings, the making of a response or supplemental responses to discovery and other pretrial matters. The case may be continued thereafter only for valid and compelling reasons specifically determined by court order. Notice of the signing of the order of dismissal shall be given as provided in Rule 306a. Failure to mail notices as required by this rule shall not affect any of the periods mentioned in Rule 306a except as provided in that rule.

2. Non-Compliance With Time Standards. Any case not disposed of within time standards promulgated by the Supreme Court under its Administrative Rules may be placed on a dismissal docket.

3. Reinstatement. A motion to reinstate shall set forth the grounds therefor and be verified by the movant or his attorney. It shall be filed with the clerk within 30 days after the order of dismissal is signed or within the period provided by Rule 306a. A copy of the motion to reinstate shall be served on each attorney of record and each party not represented by an attorney whose address is shown on the docket or in the papers on file. The clerk shall deliver a copy of the motion to the judge, who shall set a hearing on the motion as soon as practicable. The court shall notify all parties or their attorneys of record of the date, time and place of the hearing. The court shall reinstate the case upon finding after a hearing that the failure of the party or his attorney was not intentional or the result of conscious indifference but was due to an accident or mistake or that the failure has been otherwise reasonably explained.

In the event for any reason a motion for reinstatement is not decided by signed written order within seventy-five days after the judgment is signed, or, within such other time as may be allowed by Rule 306a, the motion shall be deemed overruled by operation of law. If a motion to reinstate is timely filed by any party, the trial court, regardless of whether an appeal has been perfected, has plenary power to reinstate the case until 30 days after all such timely filed motions are overruled, either by a written and signed order or by operation of law, whichever occurs first.

4. Cumulative Remedies. This dismissal and reinstatement procedure shall be cumulative of the rules and laws governing any other procedures available to the parties in such cases. The same reinstatement procedures and timetable are applicable to all dismissals for want of prosecution including cases which are dismissed pursuant to the court's inherent power, whether or not a motion to dismiss has been filed.


and I was wondering if anyone knows anything about this?
Of course no one can answer what might have triggered this notice... without knowing ALL THE FACTS... and the docket calendar.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top