What is a "valid perspective"? I suppose only perspectives that you feel support your case to steal...err...appropriate...err...use someone else's material will be seen as "valid", right?
Lobby for the change you want to see.![]()
You mean anyone willing to pat you on the head and say it's OK for you to use the material without consent of the owners?
Yeah, good luck with that.
What you don't see is that those professional producers got consent first.
It might apply if you are making that documentary without any intention of making a nickel on it. Like posting it on youtube for free for everybody to view for educational purposes.
On the other hand if you expect financial gain from it, fair use isn't likely to apply.
There is a boatload of "fair use" resources online. All you have to do is read them to figure out whether it applies to what you are doing.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=fair+use+o...al&t=hh&ia=web
You're right. With a couple of exceptions all of us ARE "armchair lawyers."
If you had read the disclaimer at the bottom of the page it wouldn't have come as a surprise to you.
Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum is never a substitute for personal advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction you have retained to represent you.
Last edited by adjusterjack; 03-29-2018 at 03:56 PM.
I am going to provide you with two links. The first link is to a previous thread on this forum that addresses the fair use of musical works in documentary films. It touches on some of the same concerns you have with your film. The second link is to the Center for Media & Social Impact website on "Documentary Filmmakers Statement of Best Practices in Fair Use." It has a wealth of information you should find helpful.
Use of music in a Documentary
http://cmsimpact.org/Code/documentar...s-in-fair-use/
It is important to remember that "fair use" is not permission to use others' copyrighted works. It is an affirmative defense to a claim of copyright infringement. It is a "yes, I infringed on another's copyrighted work but it is an excusable infringement" defense. The problem with using this defense is it is up to a court to ultimately decide if your use was in fact excusable, this AFTER you have been sued by the copyright holder.
It is ALWAYS best to get permission granted by the copyright holder prior to using copyrighted material, to avoid conflict with the copyright holder that results in a lawsuit and a court decision that could easily be in the copyright holder's favor.
And is also best to review your film plans with an IP attorney before distributing your film to the public.
I assume that when you say your documentary is "authorized" you mean releases have been signed allowing for use of all subjects' names and images and personal histories.
Good luck.
Last edited by quincy; 03-29-2018 at 06:07 PM.