50 % of moms house ????

[trucker001]

Brian ....ca.... no common law here. Can ex girlfiend of 18 yrs, go after my mothers home, that mom currently lives in, which was quick claimed to me ? Also, can she go after my retirement ? I am not vested yet.

 

[FarmerJ]

Let her try, Your right about so called common law not applying. So unless she somewhere along the way was given a written cohabitation agreement or a written agreement entitling her to a legal interest in the house then I would suggest she may not be entitled to any thing. Have you read The "NEVERS" of Living Together
By Jared Laskin
This next item is a interesting read as well >http://www.palimony.com/7.html< If your in doubt about whether the ex GF has any legitimate claim to anything from you I suggest you make sure to speak to a atty who specializes in domestic partner legal issues because she/he will be your best source of info. Try the links above to locate a atty if you feel its a good choice.

 

[nextwife]

Go after how? Do you have a child support arrearage you owe to her or some other judgment that she has docketed against you?

 

[latigo]

I think what you are asking is whether your ex-girlfriend could make any claims against you personally or be awarded any interest in your assets by reason of California community property law or any other laws of that state.

And because you and she were never intermarried the answer is an unqualified NO.

For one the California family courts have no jurisdiction over non-marital relationships such as ordering a division of joint acquired property or awarding support or alimony.

Secondly, in California, as is true in most if not all the states, individuals in a non-marital relationship do not acquire vested property rights solely by virtue of their being so-called “domestic partners”. In other words there is no such thing as marital or community property in a non-marital relationship.

Nor does the law recognize any such animal as “palimony”. And this is particularly so in the state of California where the media coined the word “palimony” as an outcrop from the much publicized case of Michelle Triola Marvin v. Lee (The actor) Marvin, 18 Cal.3d 660 (1976)

(Michelle only assumed the surname of Marvin, she and the actor were never intermarried.
_________________

Lastly, can you explain why you refer to the residence as your “mother’s home” when in the same breath you tell us that she “quick (sic) claimed” it to you?