Maryland, Howard County.
5 years ago my friend had an accident with another vehicle, I know no details about it but I think my friend was the offender and the other vehicle was the victim.
When this was brought to court the victim never showed (contempt is what I think its called) and the case was tossed out.
Five years later the victim is suing my friend for $15,000 in what I understand to be medical bills or for pains that the victim is feeling in their neck/back. He has been subpoenaed to appear in court ware the case will be heard. Does this case hold relevance to the original incident? Could he argue:
any help would be really appreciated, I’m trying to help him find a lawyer that knows what he’s doing, but I would like to see what you think would be a good approach to this.
Thanks,
Grant O.
5 years ago my friend had an accident with another vehicle, I know no details about it but I think my friend was the offender and the other vehicle was the victim.
When this was brought to court the victim never showed (contempt is what I think its called) and the case was tossed out.
Five years later the victim is suing my friend for $15,000 in what I understand to be medical bills or for pains that the victim is feeling in their neck/back. He has been subpoenaed to appear in court ware the case will be heard. Does this case hold relevance to the original incident? Could he argue:
- That their injuries are unrelated and it’s equivocal that the two are even linked.
- There would need to be an official examination done by a 3rd party doctor.
- That this is falling into the category of double-jeopardy.
any help would be really appreciated, I’m trying to help him find a lawyer that knows what he’s doing, but I would like to see what you think would be a good approach to this.
Thanks,
Grant O.
Last edited: