• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Amazon.com Wishlists

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

mbarrynh

Junior Member
I am in New Hampshire, and I have a question about wishlists online. I have a good friend of mine, that is a beautiful women, and loves to use it to her advantage. She has a amazon.com wishlist, and she just got home and found a laptop of $1,600 on her pourch. It was a gift from someone on the internet thru the wishlist. If he used a stolen credit card is she liable? She still doenst have an idea who its from.
 


jagz28

Junior Member
if there is a reasonable doubt that it may be bought with a stolen card. then it is receiving stolen property. and depending on the state may be a felony if amount is high enough. not to mention mail fraud if sent u.s.p.s. she would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt she %100 knew it was not stolen. what guy in there right mind would buy any woman that he did not know a gift like that.
 

ablessin

Member
mbarrynh said:
I am in New Hampshire, and I have a question about wishlists online. I have a good friend of mine, that is a beautiful women, and loves to use it to her advantage. She has a amazon.com wishlist, and she just got home and found a laptop of $1,600 on her pourch. It was a gift from someone on the internet thru the wishlist. If he used a stolen credit card is she liable? She still doenst have an idea who its from.


come on, right? Are you pulling my leg or what?
She has NO freaking clue who bought her a laptop? Then, HOW could she feel it was purchased with a stollen credit card???????

I find this very hard to believe
 

dallas702

Senior Member
Nonetheless, if the card was stolen she doesn't have to "prove" she didn't know. Our justice system (theoretically) works on the presumption of innocence. Therefore, any enforcement agency would have to prove that she DID know the card was stolen for her to be prosecuted successfully.

The rest of the story sounds like a load of crap.
 
For her to not "know" the sender and yet "know" the card is stolen reeks of it being the OP being the sender and how he's afraid it's going to catch him.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top