• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

anyone know??...got no replies first time

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

faithnlve

Member
Vermont. Our governor appoints the judges on the bench. Years ago it used to be the people who voted in the judges, but for years it has not been that way. So here are my questions...
1. Who has the authority in de-benching a judge? I am guessing it's the supreme court.

2. From what I have been researching it seems it comes down to all decisions especially legal changes of law are always decided on by the supreme court. Is this right? It was our supreme court which changed the law for gays to marry not the legislature.

3. Why can't the governor de-bench a judge if they are the ones who appoint them?

4. why as a people do we vote in people to represent us in legislature if they really have no power in decisions of law? Plus, what is the power of our legislature?

5. Why is there a judicial misconduct board for judicial behaviour if in fact behaviour of a judge is protected by the powers of the supreme court, and the abuse of decisions and orders are of a judge's discretion and judges are immune to being sued from harm from such abuses of discretion?

6. What is the service of a judicial retention hearing? The people voice their greivances, yet never has a judge been punished or removed for any abuses.

7. How does one lobby for a change back for the people to appoint the judicial power instead of the governor?

8. And lastly, what if our constitution says something different than how our state is actually making decisions? How can we protect our rights to our own constitution?
 


seniorjudge

Senior Member
faithnlve said:
Vermont. Our governor appoints the judges on the bench. Years ago it used to be the people who voted in the judges, but for years it has not been that way. So here are my questions...
1. Who has the authority in de-benching a judge? I am guessing it's the supreme court.

2. From what I have been researching it seems it comes down to all decisions especially legal changes of law are always decided on by the supreme court. Is this right? It was our supreme court which changed the law for gays to marry not the legislature.

3. Why can't the governor de-bench a judge if they are the ones who appoint them?

4. why as a people do we vote in people to represent us in legislature if they really have no power in decisions of law? Plus, what is the power of our legislature?

5. Why is there a judicial misconduct board for judicial behaviour if in fact behaviour of a judge is protected by the powers of the supreme court, and the abuse of decisions and orders are of a judge's discretion and judges are immune to being sued from harm from such abuses of discretion?

6. What is the service of a judicial retention hearing? The people voice their greivances, yet never has a judge been punished or removed for any abuses.

7. How does one lobby for a change back for the people to appoint the judicial power instead of the governor?

8. And lastly, what if our constitution says something different than how our state is actually making decisions? How can we protect our rights to our own constitution?

Run for your state's legislature on the above platform.

Report back with results.
 

Some Random Guy

Senior Member
How does one lobby for a change back for the people to appoint the judicial power instead of the governor?
It would be easiest to move to a state where judges are elected instead of appointed. Then you can see how special interests and lobbyists buy cases with campaign finance contributions.
 

seniorjudge

Senior Member
Some Random Guy said:
It would be easiest to move to a state where judges are elected instead of appointed. Then you can see how special interests and lobbyists buy cases with campaign finance contributions.
Read the news reports of the campaign in Illinois in 2004; one of the nastiest in history.

Makes you wonder what kind of judges you get when you let them act like presidential candidates!
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top