More so than I wanted.brisgirl825 said:OP, Singlemom has had experience in this situation and has given you valuable advice. Good luck.
You recently had some success on finding your ex, right? I believe that was you I read with an update. How have things progressed thus far?SingleMom67 said:More so than I wanted.![]()
brisgirl825 said:You recently had some success on finding your ex, right? I believe that was you I read with an update. How have things progressed thus far?
Wrong again. There goes another legally uneducated response. In PA, every plaintiff in a CSE case is assigned an attorney whether they want to use that person or not. The assigned attorney is paid by the state to represent the plaintiff. It is recommended that mom go because the state-appointed attorney doesn't know personal facts that go on outside of the court. In other words if dad (in this case) lies, attorney has no way of knowing. Mom is there to refute.WANNACRY said:CSE will actually be there on your behalf.
cse is there on behalf of the state, no one else.
mom needs to be there to protect her own interests.
The OP's order is either in Ga. or Fl. (NOT Pa.). If it is in Fl. OP needs to be there, because it is specifically written into Fl law that the attorney represents the DOR CSE- NOT the plaintiff, it even goes on to state that the attorney and DOR should advise the plaintiff that they do not represent the plaintiff. Fl. is pretty picky about that. I believe that it is also that way in Ga. although I don't know for sure if it's specific in their laws.SingleMom67 said:Wrong again. There goes another legally uneducated response. In PA, every plaintiff in a CSE case is assigned an attorney whether they want to use that person or not. The assigned attorney is paid by the state to represent the plaintiff. It is recommended that mom go because the state-appointed attorney doesn't know personal facts that go on outside of the court. In other words if dad (in this case) lies, attorney has no way of knowing. Mom is there to refute.
I was responding to WannaCry who was making a direct reply to something I said. It wasn't a state issue.Gracie3787 said:The OP's order is either in Ga. or Fl. (NOT Pa.). If it is in Fl. OP needs to be there, because it is specifically written into Fl law that the attorney represents the DOR CSE- NOT the plaintiff, it even goes on to state that the attorney and DOR should advise the plaintiff that they do not represent the plaintiff. Fl. is pretty picky about that. I believe that it is also that way in Ga. although I don't know for sure if it's specific in their laws.
Gracie![]()
Yup, our stories are similar (as too many here are). It sounds like you're doing everything you can be doing. As far as civil vs. criminal, I'll research that one and get back to you. The warrant's out of GA though right? Florida's just enforcing it? Did I understand that correctly?mom6399 said:Thanks!
My original order was issued in Minnesota, with jurisdiction transferred to GA at the end of divorce proceedings. I filed with GA CSE, NCP lives in FL. My case is in GA, but from what I can get and understand from GACSE, the case is being enforced by FLCSE? The amount ordered in MN was reduced by GA based upon NCPs income, when they were able to garnish wages for 2 months.
It is an arrest warrant issued for contempt. Is this considered criminal or civil? NCP is well into 5 figures in arrears. Quitting jobs, moving, etc...to avoid payment as well as to hide from the IRS. NCP has seen the child only twice in almost two years and has had zero contact in nearly 15 months, if that matters?
I believe his DL was suspended, a lien was put on his back account (which I am guessing at this point was empty at the time).
I am totally in the dark here. I filed with CSE on NCPs request and after I had to get a restraining order against him. I'm concerned about having to face him in court...and what his reaction might be if he is arrested and come up with the purge amount to get out. My restraining order expired a few weeks ago.