• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Being Sued

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

W

Wallst

Guest
I'm being sued for 5 million dollars for an accident in which my father had while he was driving my car. Can I be liable for over my policies limits even though I wasn't in the car?
 


I AM ALWAYS LIABLE

Senior Member
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Arial, Helvetica, Verdana">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Wallst:
I'm being sued for 5 million dollars for an accident in which my father had while he was driving my car. Can I be liable for over my policies limits even though I wasn't in the car?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

My response:

Since you failed to tell us what State the accident occurred in, or what State the car is garaged in, I'm using California law and it's anybody's guess if it's applicable to you. There are 50 States in this Union, all with differing laws.

Short answer: Yes. It makes no difference whether you were in the car; only that you let your Dad, as a permissive user, drive your car.

Coverage for the permissive-use driver under the owner's policy may not necessarily be as high as that provided the owner (named insured): The policy may validly limit permissive user coverage to the minimum amounts required by the Financial Responsibility Law (i.e., $15,000/$30,000/$5,000; see Ca Vehicle § 16056). [Mid-Century Ins. Co. v. Haynes (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 737, 267 Cal.Rptr. 248--despite owner's $100,000 coverage, insurer had no duty to defend or indemnify permissive user for damages exceeding $15,000 where policy specified additional insured coverage "up to the limits of the Financial Responsibility Law only"; Hartford Cas. Ins. Co. v. Mid-Century Ins. Co. (1994) 26 Cal.App.4th 1783, 1787, 32 Cal.Rptr.2d 351, 353]

Now, this is all assuming you can be found negligent under the theory of "Negligent Entrustment" e.g., that you gave your car to your Dad to use, despite the fact he had some legal or physical infermity causing him to be a negligent driver, and that you knew about such problem before you lent your car to your Dad.

If he had no such infermity, then you cannot be found negligent, and the injured person will only be able to get a judgment for $15,000.00 - per person, up to a max of $30,000.00 for all occupants. Then, the other driver will have to make a claim under his/her "Underinsured Motorist Coverage" if it's available, and if so, if it meets the proper criteria for such claim.

If you were not negligent in giving your Dad your car to use, you should be alright in terms of monetary responsibility to the injured parties.

IAAL


------------------
By reading the “Response” to your question or comment, you agree that: The opinions expressed herein by "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE" are designed to provide educational information only and are not intended to, nor do they, offer legal advice. Opinions expressed to you in this site are not intended to, nor does it, create an attorney-client relationship, nor does it constitute legal advice to any person reviewing such information. No electronic communication with "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE," on its own, will generate an attorney-client relationship, nor will it be considered an attorney-client privileged communication. You further agree that you will obtain your own attorney's advice and counsel for your questions responded to herein by "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE."



[This message has been edited by I AM ALWAYS LIABLE (edited April 22, 2000).]
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top