What is the name of your state?Confusion
Well some views on my last post but no takers yet; so here's another angle:
Who can forget Clinton's 'well that depends on what your definition of 'is' is.....!
So what do the feds mean here when they ask you to state 'income' in a chpt.7? Before taxes, after taxes, not even bothering with what your tax returns say, selling fruit on the side of the road, a like exchange of goods, *owners draw in a corporation that resulted in a net loss anyway to the shareholder (me, the debtor, and owner who took the draw and bears the loss)*, WHAT, WHAT, WHAT, I ask!?
Forget about the easy to read and easy to understand 'income from employment, trade, profession, etc.....'.
Situation A: I state my income as the draw I took off the corporation, for which I paid for my living expenses (nothing left over). I go to court, the trustee sees I state income at, say, $50000 for the last 3 years, which in reality is what I paid for living expenses (rent, groceries, health insurance, car loan, credit card payments, medical bills not covered by ins., etc.etc.etc).
My tax returns, however, show a negative income of, say, $49000, because the loss of the corporation flows to me, the owner. So while I lived, I did not make any money, or 'income'. What the trustee does with that info I don't know.
Situation B: I state my income as it shows on my tax returns, which is all negative, in more ways than one. Trustee looks at it, looks at my expenses, and says, well sir, just how are you living? Selling fruit on the side of the road? I say, well Mr. Trustee, that depends on what your definition of 'income' is actually income. What the trustee does with that info, I don't know either.
If someone is in the know out there, I'll take any helpful insight you have to offer. Please don't tell me to state what I got from employment, technically, my corporation did not employ me, I just lived off it, or rather, I lived off the credit cards that supported the cash flow that kept my business going for as long as my credit cards could possibly do so.
Hope this isn't too complicated for the intellectuals out there (never claimed to be one!). I feel like I'm stuck in some kind of boolean logic puzzle....yuck.
thanks,
j.m.
Well some views on my last post but no takers yet; so here's another angle:
Who can forget Clinton's 'well that depends on what your definition of 'is' is.....!
So what do the feds mean here when they ask you to state 'income' in a chpt.7? Before taxes, after taxes, not even bothering with what your tax returns say, selling fruit on the side of the road, a like exchange of goods, *owners draw in a corporation that resulted in a net loss anyway to the shareholder (me, the debtor, and owner who took the draw and bears the loss)*, WHAT, WHAT, WHAT, I ask!?
Forget about the easy to read and easy to understand 'income from employment, trade, profession, etc.....'.
Situation A: I state my income as the draw I took off the corporation, for which I paid for my living expenses (nothing left over). I go to court, the trustee sees I state income at, say, $50000 for the last 3 years, which in reality is what I paid for living expenses (rent, groceries, health insurance, car loan, credit card payments, medical bills not covered by ins., etc.etc.etc).
My tax returns, however, show a negative income of, say, $49000, because the loss of the corporation flows to me, the owner. So while I lived, I did not make any money, or 'income'. What the trustee does with that info I don't know.
Situation B: I state my income as it shows on my tax returns, which is all negative, in more ways than one. Trustee looks at it, looks at my expenses, and says, well sir, just how are you living? Selling fruit on the side of the road? I say, well Mr. Trustee, that depends on what your definition of 'income' is actually income. What the trustee does with that info, I don't know either.
If someone is in the know out there, I'll take any helpful insight you have to offer. Please don't tell me to state what I got from employment, technically, my corporation did not employ me, I just lived off it, or rather, I lived off the credit cards that supported the cash flow that kept my business going for as long as my credit cards could possibly do so.
Hope this isn't too complicated for the intellectuals out there (never claimed to be one!). I feel like I'm stuck in some kind of boolean logic puzzle....yuck.
thanks,
j.m.