What is the name of your state? CA
I had a brokerage account. As a sign of commitment ("in contemplation of marriage"), I added her name, making it a joint account. Her part of the deal was to add me as beneficiary to various accounts of hers, and to add me to her health insurance policy (through her employer).
Without telling me, she removed my name from all her accounts and from the health insurance. (We are no longer contemplating marriage.)
I say that that broke the contract, and she should have simultaneously removed herself from the Joint Account. She has since tried to withdraw a large sum without my knowledge; fortunately, the institution (which is where she works) got suspicious of her activities and froze the account.
She never put a dime into the account, and I can prove it. It was always understood that it was my money, and we both acted that way. (Only I did transactions.)
I don't believe she should be entitled to this money after breaking the agreement.
I suspect that she could have ripped me off legally if she had withdrawn the money before she broke the contract, but the attempt came after.
Is there a flaw in my logic?
I had a brokerage account. As a sign of commitment ("in contemplation of marriage"), I added her name, making it a joint account. Her part of the deal was to add me as beneficiary to various accounts of hers, and to add me to her health insurance policy (through her employer).
Without telling me, she removed my name from all her accounts and from the health insurance. (We are no longer contemplating marriage.)
I say that that broke the contract, and she should have simultaneously removed herself from the Joint Account. She has since tried to withdraw a large sum without my knowledge; fortunately, the institution (which is where she works) got suspicious of her activities and froze the account.
She never put a dime into the account, and I can prove it. It was always understood that it was my money, and we both acted that way. (Only I did transactions.)
I don't believe she should be entitled to this money after breaking the agreement.
I suspect that she could have ripped me off legally if she had withdrawn the money before she broke the contract, but the attempt came after.
Is there a flaw in my logic?