What is the name What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? IL
The verbal contract with the agency was made over 30 years ago. The government agency has indicated in writing that they plan for the public tourist attraction to remove itself including it's facility (building & contents) off the local government owned land in one year.
a. It's my understanding from reading, that since we're dealing with government there is a shorter "time period to file a breach of contract?"
b. Is the time frame for filing when notified "by actions the council took" which stated in their minutes we were to leave? Or, if we meet with them personally at some point and then they personally tell us.
a. We have never received an "eviction notice".
c. The government staff and council has never disputed the agreement existed.
d. Is there something we should have a lawyer file to stop the clock?
a. We don't know whether to sit and wait and see what government will do next.
e. As a not for profit registered with the state -- in the bylaws submitted 30 years ago it states -- if we no longer exist as a not-for-profit corporation that our building would be donated to the city. I suppose at the time, the assumption was that if there weren't enough volunteers to operate the public tourist attraction there would be no reason for the building and we (not-for-profit) would have ceased to exist. That is not correct - we exist and we function as per the original verbal agreement.of your state (only U.S. law)?
The verbal contract with the agency was made over 30 years ago. The government agency has indicated in writing that they plan for the public tourist attraction to remove itself including it's facility (building & contents) off the local government owned land in one year.
a. It's my understanding from reading, that since we're dealing with government there is a shorter "time period to file a breach of contract?"
b. Is the time frame for filing when notified "by actions the council took" which stated in their minutes we were to leave? Or, if we meet with them personally at some point and then they personally tell us.
a. We have never received an "eviction notice".
c. The government staff and council has never disputed the agreement existed.
d. Is there something we should have a lawyer file to stop the clock?
a. We don't know whether to sit and wait and see what government will do next.
e. As a not for profit registered with the state -- in the bylaws submitted 30 years ago it states -- if we no longer exist as a not-for-profit corporation that our building would be donated to the city. I suppose at the time, the assumption was that if there weren't enough volunteers to operate the public tourist attraction there would be no reason for the building and we (not-for-profit) would have ceased to exist. That is not correct - we exist and we function as per the original verbal agreement.of your state (only U.S. law)?