• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Breaking a lease before it begins

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

C

Cathryn

Guest
my sister in law lives in FL, she owns a home in CT which she has been renting out with no problems. The lease expires Sept 2000 and she has already signed the extension. However now her mom and handicaped brother have been displaced and she needs to move them into her house, and renovate and make it all accessable. She is honoring the current lease, but wants to move her family there sept 2000. As soon as she knew she told them, giving them 6 months notice. They said they want to be compensated and hired a lawyer. My sister in law did not tell them why she wanted to take over occupancy in sept.
Please advise what you think....
Should she call the lawyer that sent her the letter ,and tell him of her heartship.
Thanks for your time, Catherine
 


I AM ALWAYS LIABLE

Senior Member
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Cathryn:
my sister in law lives in FL, she owns a home in CT which she has been renting out with no problems. The lease expires Sept 2000 and she has already signed the extension. However now her mom and handicaped brother have been displaced and she needs to move them into her house, and renovate and make it all accessable. She is honoring the current lease, but wants to move her family there sept 2000. As soon as she knew she told them, giving them 6 months notice. They said they want to be compensated and hired a lawyer. My sister in law did not tell them why she wanted to take over occupancy in sept.
Please advise what you think....
Should she call the lawyer that sent her the letter ,and tell him of her heartship.
Thanks for your time, Catherine
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>


My response:

Sister and tenants are now in privity of contract (that means they're joined at the hip). The tenant is correct. In order to get what your sister wants, i.e., a release from the tenancy lease agreement, a new, third, contract must be made to cancel the second contract. The reason the attorney is involved is because your sister is anticipating that she'll be breaching the second contract ("Anticapatory Breach") and the attorney is warning her against it, and what the outcome will be - - a lawsuit and damages. It makes no difference WHY your sister wants to breach the contract, and the attorney, nor his clients, could care less.
If your sister insists on using that house, the difficult thing will be the negotiations of contract #3. Right now, the tenants have her "over a barrel" and if she wants the house, they're bound to make crazy demands, like: 1) Pay us 50% of the lease value, 2) Pay for our moving expenses, 3) Pay for our deposit and security fees on a new place, and 4) Find us an acceptable, similar house, and 5). . . . well, the list could go on.

Good luck to you and your sister.

IAAL



------------------
By reading the “Response” to your question or comment, you agree that: The opinions expressed herein by "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE" are designed to provide educational information only and are not intended to, nor do they, offer legal advice. Opinions expressed to you in this site are not intended to, nor does it, create an attorney-client relationship, nor does it constitute legal advice to any person reviewing such information. No electronic communication with "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE," on its own, will generate an attorney-client relationship, nor will it be considered an attorney-client privileged communication. You further agree that you will obtain your own attorney's advice and counsel for your questions responded to herein by "I AM ALWAYS LIABLE."

 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top