What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? California
I have a 1 month old son, his father left me a couple weeks before I gave birth. Father was at the birth & signed paternity papers, really loves his son and where I don't think he's made enough effort to see him consistently, he does usually take him a few hours a week and has had 2 overnights. I have let the father see his son any time he's wanted so far since I'm still off work, except for once when he wanted to take our son to his parents for 3 days which I felt was too long and I didn't have enough stored milk to send, and once after he was angry with me and not seen his son in 2 days he text he was on his way over to see him and we were in the middle of breastfeeding and I told him to give me more time & he could come back anytime after we were done (so he threw a fit and didn't come at all).
We are currently in agreement with custody/visitation/child support. Unfortunately, he becomes very unreasonable when he gets angry or we disagree on anything (mainly refusing to come see his son because he is mad at me saying he needs to calm down & not have his son when he's angry), so I would not mind getting it officially put in writing and signed by a judge so it's enforceable, but since we're agreeing & he's not angry with me right now, he's no longer threatening to take me to court.
I have read that under California Family Code section 7610 an unwed mother automatically has custody and determines who/when people see the child and basically makes all decisions for the child. Is this still true even if the father signs the paternity forms in the hospital? I would never keep my child from his father, my only concern is if the father gets angry with me and tries to keep him from me, I don't want law enforcement to say I can't get my child back at our agreed time because we don't have orders signed by a judge. So if I already have "legal" custody and am protected I am okay with not going to court.
Also in our talk the father said he wanted 49% legal custody. This seems odd to me, because I would think giving me 51% would allow me to make all decisions for my son & not really give him any say. Is that correct? I want what's best for my son and am not interested in having total control to keep him away from his father in any way, my only concern is from the fathers history of not being able to be reasonable when he is angry for any reason.
Thank you!