I would say it would be something that 100% of the people reading it would understand the meaning except for 1 overzealous attorney trying to make a name for himself.
Utah UTAH CODE ANN. §68-3-12.5 (2014) §68-3-12.5. (16) "Person" means: (a) an individual; (b) an association; (c) an institution; (d) a corporation; (e) a company; (f) a trust; (g) a limited liability company; (h) a partnership; (i) a political subdivision; (j) a government office, department, division, bureau, or other body of government; and (k) any other organization or entity
http://www.ncsl.org/documents/lsss/tue_haskins_handout2.pdf
According to this so called attorney, person means "only an Individual human being" NOT a association, NOT an institution, Not a corporation, NOT a company, NOT a trust, NOT a limited liability company, NOT a partnership, NOT a political subdivision, NOT a government office, division, bureau or other body of government and NOT any other organization or entity. He actually quoted his law and copied and pasted the entire definition as justification for what he was saying even thought it said the exact opposite.
Basally he said it means the exact opposite of what its started and quoted this exact section as his justification.
This guy was a little kid playing some opposite day game.
I did not know if it was like " Bring your kid to work day" and he had a young child drafting attorney response letters and emails or if this guy was for real. I actually heard of a surgeon who brought his kid into work and had him participating in surgeries on people. However never a lawyer doing this.
Also he stuck by this " interpretation" after months of being told otherwise and asking him to read the law again. It was not some technical oversight but something he stood by and double down on over and over.
That is why I am asking for sanctions or disbarment because it was so egregious. I think this guy just did not like me so he was willing to violate whatever ethics he may have had just to stop me from getting what I wanted or he was the most retarded lawyer to ever get a law degree.
What do you guys think? Just add the word " NOT" to whatever law they quote like a 6 year old? Is that anyway for an officer of the court to act?
Quote me any law that is very obvious what it means. I will add the word " NOT" in front of it and claim that is the true meaning of the law.
Completely absurd. Is this justifiable complaint on this so called attorney?