New York, but it is on the federal level.
In this scenario, take the case where a large wooden sign that says “Black Lives Matter” with a depiction of the upward-facing “Black Lives Matter” fist is set on fire, intentionally. Assuming that the act of arson involved “actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin” (as is the language used in 18 USC § 249), would the crime constitute a hate crime (in any federal statute, it doesn’t just have to be the one stated, if applicable).
Thanks so much!!
In this scenario, take the case where a large wooden sign that says “Black Lives Matter” with a depiction of the upward-facing “Black Lives Matter” fist is set on fire, intentionally. Assuming that the act of arson involved “actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin” (as is the language used in 18 USC § 249), would the crime constitute a hate crime (in any federal statute, it doesn’t just have to be the one stated, if applicable).
Thanks so much!!