Can'tSeemToWin
Member
What is the name of your state? Massachusetts. My husband has been fighting a case for almost a year to get his daughter back. Long story short, he had his daughter since she was 8 years old, she is now 16. My husband and his daughter had a falling out, the daughter went to the grandmother's house. The grandmother filed for guardianship and it was granted based on the fact that my husband didn't show up for the court date. (My husband was never notified).
His lawyer went to a later court date (we had just moved to NC and couldn't go to court, nor did his lawyer think we needed to appear) and the judge said the grandmother didn't have a case and that he just wanted to eyeball my husband. We went to appear in court and it was snowed out (Jan. 2005) so court was cancelled. The date was rescheduled and we were assigned another judge because all dockets were reassigned. This judge was an absolute jerk, at the last court date, the judge set a trial date.
My husband's lawyer received a notice yesterday that the case has been reassigned back to the original judge. My question is this, since the first judge told the grandmother she didn't have a case until now we have spent about $5,000 between legals fees and flights to and from Mass. for both us and the daughter we are trying to get back. Because this first judge is now back on the case here are my quesitons:
Do we have to proceed with the trial date that is set now that the case is back in the first judges hands?
Can we ask that the grandmother reimburse us for the money we have put into this because she is the one who ultimately took my husband to court? I'm not greedy, just curious.
His lawyer went to a later court date (we had just moved to NC and couldn't go to court, nor did his lawyer think we needed to appear) and the judge said the grandmother didn't have a case and that he just wanted to eyeball my husband. We went to appear in court and it was snowed out (Jan. 2005) so court was cancelled. The date was rescheduled and we were assigned another judge because all dockets were reassigned. This judge was an absolute jerk, at the last court date, the judge set a trial date.
My husband's lawyer received a notice yesterday that the case has been reassigned back to the original judge. My question is this, since the first judge told the grandmother she didn't have a case until now we have spent about $5,000 between legals fees and flights to and from Mass. for both us and the daughter we are trying to get back. Because this first judge is now back on the case here are my quesitons:
Do we have to proceed with the trial date that is set now that the case is back in the first judges hands?
Can we ask that the grandmother reimburse us for the money we have put into this because she is the one who ultimately took my husband to court? I'm not greedy, just curious.