CBG and Beth3 please comment on this thread

[Katy W.]

Yes. He sidesteps every question, makes innuendos, cites inappropriate laws, is uncooperative and basically a smarta**. If I were management there, I would not fire him...I would strangle him.

 

[cbg]

I suspect I would too, Katy. In fact, I thought that transcript went a long way towards disproving his "case", regardless of how he saw it.

 

[rmet4nzkx]

Needless to say, it also goes a long way to proving he is not competent in many ways whether or not he believes he is. He does avoid questions as a defense, he also avoided answering whether or not he graduated from college, which would at least provide some insight of his ability to adapt in a working environment. He also was bragging about omitting the pervious employment to fellow employees and other provocative discussions, they complained to management, that is how management discovered he had falsified his application and then believes the same employees are going to testify on his behalf if it actually goes to trial? Even if he had never falsified his application, it is unlikely they would have been able to accommodate his poor work habits forever. I am fairly sure of his diagnosis and that it would qualify under ADA as a disability, however it may not render him capable of anything other than employment in a structured and supportive environment with constant supervision. A desire to strangle is a common response to this particular disorder.

 

[cbg]

I'll have to take your word for that, Ms. Cupcake - that's more your field than mine. But I agree with your points regarding the accomodation attempts and the poor work habits. You and I both know that even under the ADA, the employee is still expected to perform to standard, barring a lesser standard being part of the accomodation (which is NOT required).

 

[Shay-Pari'e]

Hmmmmm am I reading something into this, the last time I asked him about being disabled he stayed away for a while and never answered. Do we know that admin closed the thread or could Josh have? The last post is me telling him that somebody's gotta be disabled for him t sue under the ADA. How can Megan be lurking, she posts at least once a day, I thought?

You're right about his disability. He may not think he really has one, though.

Sorry to butt in, but I sent the link to Mary because of Megan, and she confirmed she locked it.

OK, back to the topic.........

 

[meganproser]

Megan has been warned again bye Mary, this time it is her stalking. That is why the thread is closed.

Uh, Mrs. Kravitz, it would appear that YOU showed up in THIS thread by following someone. Are YOU a stalker?

FYI, I have not heard from Mary since the last time you ran to her. You are a world class tattler aren't you? Why do you need others to fight/end the battles that YOU begin?

Last time you say Mary "warned" me, what I got from her was the statement that we are not supposed to be arguing with each other directly. Rather we are to each post what we want to say to the OP and refrain from taking issue with someone else’s post.

Why do YOU have such trouble following that policy...or do you think it does not apply to YOU?

What part of the following offer I made yesterday was too complicated for you?

“ By all means take the last word in this thread. Then, if you can CONTROL yourself and stop addressing me directly or talking about me in your posts, I know I can manage to do the same for you.
If you can’t manage to refrain from bothering me, expect to be bothered in return.”

You responded by saying: “I'm not bothered, you are pure entertainment at it's finest.”
But that doesn’t really seem to be true now, does it?

If it is against the rules to enter a thread to defend yourself against someone who has spoken about you, then that is cool with me. I hope it will be ok with you though, when I go all over this site, talking about you and you are not able to respond.

For someone interested in law, you have a bizarre concept of fairness. Fortunately, I believe Mary is a bit more level headed.

Hey BTW, why didn’t you send Mary the thread where I showed you how idiotic this statement of yours was:

“No other court will even consider a pro se person to use the ECF at this time.”

 

[Shay-Pari'e]

Great! Another waste of a thread now. We just can't escape you.

 

[rmet4nzkx]

Megan,
I started this thread to discuss the case without your distraction. We are all of the opinion that Josh doesn't have a case, so all the civil proceedure in the world won't help him and all the work he has done with your encouragement has only taken him farther from his goal when he could have spent the time looking for an attorney to assist him. I hope you can sleep, because Josh won't be able to because of you. You have stalked and harassed people on this forum and that must stop. Please don't respond to this thread. Please don't come after me or any other member of this forum.

 

[meganproser]

You have stalked and harassed people on this forum and that must stop. Please don't respond to this thread. Please don't come after me or any other member of this forum.

Why would you put a statement up here, claiming I stalk and harass people, and then think I WON’T respond? I spelled out a workable agreement for you THREE times this week, yet you choose NOT to be agreeable. WHAT does that say about YOU?

I have a problem, with you or Mrs. Kravitz making disparaging remarks about me in public. I took it for quite a while without argument but as I told you, those days are over. Thus, if you talk to or about me in these forums, I feel entitled to respond. Doesn’t that seem only fair to you?

I have not stalked or harassed anyone. The record (please see archives) clearly shows that I ONLY speak to you or Mrs. Kravitz in RESPONSE to something (usually critical or nasty) that you have said to me. The solution to any problem you have with me is in YOUR hands. If you don’t bother me, I won’t bother you.

You were doing quite well today till you felt the need to once again fight Mrs. Kravitz’ battle for her. Do you have so little respect for her that you think she needs your help?

 

[cbg]

Okay. All three of you. Megan, Paradise, and even you, Ms. Cupcake -

CUT IT OUT. NOW.

 

[rmet4nzkx]

Megan,
You were the one who came here and disrupted yet another thread. I thought about locking it, but hoped you could act like an adult, but that seems impossible. Your actions speak for themselves, I don't need to point them out. If you don't insist on giveing out wrong advice, then no one will have to point it out.
Sorry CBG, we were posting at the same time, I was hoping she would stop that's why I waited, apparently I was wrong.

 

[Shay-Pari'e]

Okay. All three of you. Megan, Paradise, and even you, Ms. Cupcake -

CUT IT OUT. NOW.

Excuse me CBG, Megan hijacked the thread because she stalks us. I simply answered a question in regards to Josh's post being closed. RMET asked her again not to respond. I take offense to being put in the same circle as that mental nut case.

 

[Shay-Pari'e]

RMET,

Please close the thread, you know she will not stop. Megan if you didn't search out our posts, you would never have known you were even mentioned. That is STALKING, and you have mental issues if you need to do that.

 

[rmet4nzkx]

Thank you CBG for commenting on the thread/case it was a hugh job I was hoping for a final summary but I think we are all in agreement. I hope Josh will finally get an attorney. It seems our hijacker won't go away peacefully.