What is the name of your state? MN
Chauvin was found guilty of 3 charges, murder 2, murder 3 and 2nd degree manslaughter. Watching court proceeding on TV usually the jury will have choices to choose from when finding one guilty and always pick just one. Say they chose murder2 then the other 2 are moot. When they find him guilty of the man 2 charge it seems it would negate the other 2 more serious charges because of intent. I just don't understand being guilty of all 3 when all need different findings to be found guilty of. Is this a quirk in MN law? It just doesn't make sense. Also will the most serious charge be the sentence that matters? What happens to the lessor 2 charges at sentencing? Being found guilty of those 3 charges is that a reason to win an appeal?
Chauvin was found guilty of 3 charges, murder 2, murder 3 and 2nd degree manslaughter. Watching court proceeding on TV usually the jury will have choices to choose from when finding one guilty and always pick just one. Say they chose murder2 then the other 2 are moot. When they find him guilty of the man 2 charge it seems it would negate the other 2 more serious charges because of intent. I just don't understand being guilty of all 3 when all need different findings to be found guilty of. Is this a quirk in MN law? It just doesn't make sense. Also will the most serious charge be the sentence that matters? What happens to the lessor 2 charges at sentencing? Being found guilty of those 3 charges is that a reason to win an appeal?