MissouriWhat is the name of your state?
Child is in n carolina shes9 been there since she was twoMissouri
Well, you don't have her either and she does need to be supported so pay your child support. It was court ordered, correct?Child support went from164 to 500 a month he doesn't have her
Agreed. But the CS should go to whoever is actually raising the child... It is, however, telling that OP's concern is the $$ rather than the child.Well, you don't have her either and she does need to be supported so pay your child support. It was court ordered, correct?
Then the person who actually is raising the kid can bring a child support action.Agreed. But the CS should go to whoever is actually raising the child.
I disagree. The fact that the OP doesn't want someone who is NOT caring for the child to get his/her child support money does not in any way reflect on how much the OP cares for the child. You know nothing of the OP's situation and are, I think, assuming an awful lot in reaching that conclusion. It certainly isn't supported by anything said so far.It is, however, telling that OP's concern is the $$ rather than the child.
Absolutely. It is also quite possible that the other parent gets the CS and hands it over to the person/people caring for the child.Then the person who actually is raising the kid can bring a child support action.
Again - we don't know that the parent not caring for the child is keeping the money. And sure, we know nothing of the situation. I tend to read between lines, though...I disagree. The fact that the OP doesn't want someone who is NOT caring for the child to get his/her child support money does not in any way reflect on how much the OP cares for the child. You know nothing of the OP's situation and are, I think, assuming an awful lot in reaching that conclusion. It certainly isn't supported by anything said so far.
Between the lines is just white space. Especially when we know nothing of the situation it's impossible to read anything into it without making a whole lot of assumptions — assumptions that may not be anywhere near accurate. Bluntly, I think attacking posters with little to no information about them is wrong.And sure, we know nothing of the situation. I tend to read between lines, though...
1. Who currently has the child?Child support went from164 to 500 a month he doesn't have her
Sorry, TM, but that wasn't even close to approaching an attack.Bluntly, I think attacking posters with little to no information about them is wrong.