I live in North Carolina. We elect the board of our HOA in February. In January the management company sends out a notice which includes the following:
Even if you are planning on attending this meeting, we ask that you complete the enclosed proxy and return it to us, so that if a last minute change prevents you from attending the meeting, we can still obtain the quorum requirements to conduct business. If you have sent your proxy in and do attend the meeting, the proxy will be returned to you at the time you sign in. The proxy enables a Board of Directors member or another homeowner of your choice to vote in your absence.
I see several problems with this.
First, the Board should not be allowed to solicit blank ballots from homeowners! The Board should not be allowed to use this process to vote themselves into office. From what I can learn, this meets the definition of a conflict of interest. Even if it dosen’t meet the letter of the law, it violates the spirit of the law, it has the appearance of a conflict of interest.
Second, the management company, who we hire for their expertise in HOA management and legal matters, should never have permitted that language to be used in the annual meeting notice. It sure looks like this too is a conflict of interest. After all, it is the Board who hires and pays the management company. Again, even if it dosen’t meet the letter of the law, it violates the spirit of the law, it has the appearance of a conflict of interest.
What do you think? Thank you.
Even if you are planning on attending this meeting, we ask that you complete the enclosed proxy and return it to us, so that if a last minute change prevents you from attending the meeting, we can still obtain the quorum requirements to conduct business. If you have sent your proxy in and do attend the meeting, the proxy will be returned to you at the time you sign in. The proxy enables a Board of Directors member or another homeowner of your choice to vote in your absence.
I see several problems with this.
First, the Board should not be allowed to solicit blank ballots from homeowners! The Board should not be allowed to use this process to vote themselves into office. From what I can learn, this meets the definition of a conflict of interest. Even if it dosen’t meet the letter of the law, it violates the spirit of the law, it has the appearance of a conflict of interest.
Second, the management company, who we hire for their expertise in HOA management and legal matters, should never have permitted that language to be used in the annual meeting notice. It sure looks like this too is a conflict of interest. After all, it is the Board who hires and pays the management company. Again, even if it dosen’t meet the letter of the law, it violates the spirit of the law, it has the appearance of a conflict of interest.
What do you think? Thank you.