D
drooks
Guest
My home is built on a slab foundation in North Texas over soil with high clay content. My engineer's report says I need 41 piers to correct my slab foundation and that the work can be done now.
Insurance company's engineer's report says piers are not required, and recommends mudjacking to correct foundation, and that work should not be started until April 2003 to allow soil to dry from leaks in slab that were repaired in July 2002 (not required for concrete piers method).
I have made it ultimately clear that I will not accept the recommendations of their engineer. I have heard that mudjacking is no longer considered adequate repair method for foundation problems as severe as mine due to many lawsuits resulting from failed mudjacking foundation repair.
I need multiple case law to refer to in this regard. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION YOU HAVE ON THIS SUBJECT.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR INPUT.
Insurance company's engineer's report says piers are not required, and recommends mudjacking to correct foundation, and that work should not be started until April 2003 to allow soil to dry from leaks in slab that were repaired in July 2002 (not required for concrete piers method).
I have made it ultimately clear that I will not accept the recommendations of their engineer. I have heard that mudjacking is no longer considered adequate repair method for foundation problems as severe as mine due to many lawsuits resulting from failed mudjacking foundation repair.
I need multiple case law to refer to in this regard. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION YOU HAVE ON THIS SUBJECT.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR INPUT.