K
kaprice
Guest
Let's say I was having a casual conversation with the author of this best-selling book. And, I mention to the author that I could make a really good software app from his book that would help people implement the techniques taught in his book. I also say that it might be a great thing to offer to his customer list. He says that's a great idea, and sends me a copy of the book.
Then, I spend several months digesting, gleaning, and reorganizing his work. I take several pages, and condense them down to the essential concepts in one or two paragraphs. Out of 15 chapters, I come up with five sections.
I develop the application (foolishly without having agreed upon any details of the deal). I show it to the author, who is impressed. But, negotiations breakdown because we cannot agree on terms or on control of the software product.
So, can I take those same sections, remove the content that is specific to his book, pull content from other books on the same topic to populate the same sections, without violating derivative rights?
Let's pretend the book is on hypnosis. From studying this book, I break the process down into sections: Relaxing, Induction, Positive Suggestions, and Reinforcement. His book actually addresses 15 elements of hypnosis.
These aspects of hypnosis are widely known and commonly accepted and are discussed in many books on hypnosis.
Can the original author claim that I violated derivative rights simply because I began the process with his book, even though the specifics of each section ultimately get pulled from other books?
If so, how can I avoid it?
Then, I spend several months digesting, gleaning, and reorganizing his work. I take several pages, and condense them down to the essential concepts in one or two paragraphs. Out of 15 chapters, I come up with five sections.
I develop the application (foolishly without having agreed upon any details of the deal). I show it to the author, who is impressed. But, negotiations breakdown because we cannot agree on terms or on control of the software product.
So, can I take those same sections, remove the content that is specific to his book, pull content from other books on the same topic to populate the same sections, without violating derivative rights?
Let's pretend the book is on hypnosis. From studying this book, I break the process down into sections: Relaxing, Induction, Positive Suggestions, and Reinforcement. His book actually addresses 15 elements of hypnosis.
These aspects of hypnosis are widely known and commonly accepted and are discussed in many books on hypnosis.
Can the original author claim that I violated derivative rights simply because I began the process with his book, even though the specifics of each section ultimately get pulled from other books?
If so, how can I avoid it?