• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

covert discrimination

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

mom53

Junior Member
What is the name of your state?What is the name of your state? Washington
I am involved in a civil case. Decisions by the Superior Court Judge appear to be based on the chronolgy of events during the time the Petitioner and Respondent were involved. In more than one instance the Superior Court Judge appears to have ignored evidence and "decided" an event occurred out of sequence. Both Petitioner and Respondent have submitted date stamped evidence that proves when the disputed event occurred. Both the Petitioner's and Respondent's testimony and evidence are in agreement that the event happened on a certain date. Four months after the Judge decided it happened. The decision to move the event out of sequence clearly benefits one party. The judge refuses to listen to either attorney on the matter. Where can I read information on superior court laws and proceedures governing county judges in civil suits. Is there an organization such as the ACLU that I could consult to oversee, montor or provide information.

Can a Judge openly and freely admit bias towards one party when not all testmony has been heard and the trial has been continued?

Thank you for any informtion that can be given.


The case is still in progress.
 


Tolfraedic

Junior Member
Covert discrimination

There is aboslutely nothing you can do. Generally known as the "Old Boys Club", these guys protect each other and are given the power to do as they please. Justice? There is none.... As long as they stay within the law, no one is going to question if there is a precendent for a specific decision, in your case, a covert discrimination. Sometimes even a published previous opinion by the same court, is being ignored, as happened in my own case. Here I found a Judge known in the greater Portland legal community, to be known for his unprecedented and prejudicial opinions.

Of course, a complaint brought no results....

Besides, lawyers of the type of the civil rights lawyers of the 60th, are an extinct breed. Today, the law is governed by the wealth of the client.
 

HomeGuru

Senior Member
Tolfraedic said:
There is aboslutely nothing you can do. Generally known as the "Old Boys Club", these guys protect each other and are given the power to do as they please. Justice? There is none.... As long as they stay within the law, no one is going to question if there is a precendent for a specific decision, in your case, a covert discrimination. Sometimes even a published previous opinion by the same court, is being ignored, as happened in my own case. Here I found a Judge known in the greater Portland legal community, to be known for his unprecedented and prejudicial opinions.

Of course, a complaint brought no results....

Besides, lawyers of the type of the civil rights lawyers of the 60th, are an extinct breed. Today, the law is governed by the wealth of the client.

**A: there is also the "good Ole Boys Club" and the stink breed of lawyers.
 

mom53

Junior Member
Washington, I am very greatful to those who took the time to confirm that what is written between the lines carries more wieight than that which is written by the court in print.

2nd question:
There is the issue of a sizeable debt paid to me by a federal office. Money that was directly deposited to my account, in my name, but was used for community living expenses. The same bank statement submitted into evidence showed the direct deposit of the federal money as well as a deposit of proceeds from the sale of my seperate property. In the same breath the judge determined that the seperate property money was spent on community debt, yet on the same bank statement, the judge sated the federal money was not used for living expenses and is my seperate debt.
So Respondent is getting 1/2 + of petitioner's assests, but petitioner is getting 100% of the bills, in a community property state????
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top