K
kblowers
Guest
State of Washington
As I understand it, in a criminal trial, the defendant is entitled to present his theory of the case.
When using an affirmative defense, for example, such as Self-Defense, the defendant must produce some evidence supporting his theory.
Once evidence is presented, or exists on the record (the defendants burden of production has been satisfied), the burden then shifts to the prosecution to disprove Self-Defense beyond a reasonable doubt.
Questions
1.) In or on the record? What does this mean?
2.) Is mere testimony alone, enough for evidence to be considered "in", or "on the record"?
3.) What is an offer of proof?
4.) Is it something that must be put on in order for something to be considered in or on the record?
5.) Once evidence has been produced, does the burden shift automatically?
6.) Or does someone have to declare or say something?
7.) Who is ultimately responsible to say something? Defense Council?, or the Court?
As I understand it, in a criminal trial, the defendant is entitled to present his theory of the case.
When using an affirmative defense, for example, such as Self-Defense, the defendant must produce some evidence supporting his theory.
Once evidence is presented, or exists on the record (the defendants burden of production has been satisfied), the burden then shifts to the prosecution to disprove Self-Defense beyond a reasonable doubt.
Questions
1.) In or on the record? What does this mean?
2.) Is mere testimony alone, enough for evidence to be considered "in", or "on the record"?
3.) What is an offer of proof?
4.) Is it something that must be put on in order for something to be considered in or on the record?
5.) Once evidence has been produced, does the burden shift automatically?
6.) Or does someone have to declare or say something?
7.) Who is ultimately responsible to say something? Defense Council?, or the Court?