debandgary said:
I wanted to know what happens when the custodial parent is in contempt but apparently you can't answer that. I don't know why you appear to have an attitude towards my post. If it is the fact that I mentioned a restraining order than maybe you need to know that the only reason he has that is because he has money and I don't. Anybody can make an accusation and until I can afford an attorney to fight him on this I have to live without seeing my children. I haven't done anything wrong or broken any laws in case you need to know. I am a very loving mother and my children are very upset about not seeing me either and I really don't need any attitude from anybody right now. All I wanted was an answer, not an attitude. It is hard enough being in this position and not knowing where to turn or what to do. I guess custodial parents really do have all the rights.
My response:
When a litigant is in "Contempt of Court", that litigant (no matter which one) can suffer the same consequences as any other litigant. The same thing happens to an NCP as well as a CP. I can't help what a "specific judge" might do ! Judges have great discretion as to how they deal with someone who disobeys a court order - - and that includes anything from jail time, to paying a fine, to a combination of consequences, to nothing at all.
Custodial parents, theoretically, have no more "Rights" than any other person. If a CP disobeys a court order, and goes to jail, then the NCP takes a chance that the children will either be placed in the custody of the NCP, or be placed into Foster Care.
That's what can happen. In the final analysis, it all depends upon the judge and how that judge sees the parties, and knows of their background. For example, if you have a criminal background, then you take a chance on your children not being placed with you. There are all sorts of scenarios.
Satisfied ?
IAAL