• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Desperately need advice!!

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mbarr

Member
singledaddytwo said:
Hmmmmmm, let's see, does pictures of her room with his stuff in there and them two lying in bed with the datestamp on the photos count for anything? See, you can call me an idiot if you want but I am far from that. I have ALL my bases covered and I came here seeking advice........and never dreamed I would spill what I have in here and get the "big deal" response that I did. My true feelings? If I mention the word court to her, she'll GLADLY give them up to me because court is NOT where she wants to go, she has already told me that.

How did I get the photos? Well, she chose to go out a Saturday night she had my girls and I told her I'd watch them at her house if she couldn't find anyone else and if it was a "dire emergency" that she went out that particular night. She went out, I got the proof via pictures so it just added one more piece of evidence to my collection. I have documented every adverse thing she has done since day one and I intend to use every bit of it if my day in court is necessary.
If you REMOVED an already existing photograph from your ex's home, it cannot be used in court. You STOLE the photo, and it is "fruit from a poisoned tree." Ask your lawyer about that legal term of art.

Let's just say that both their backs were exposed, topless, and the dresser in her room saying "Keep out" Property of " HER BOYFRIENDS NAME", is not something you would carry back and forth if you were just "visiting". This photo in my hand showing her , him and the dresser is dated with a date making her 15 and just under 3 months old. If a judge blows that picture off, I will personally humiliate him via my right to FREEDOM OF PRESS
If you SHOT the photo, you are in serious trouble. Ever heard of kiddie porn? You are, presumably, a grown man and if you made a photograph of a 15 year olds girl's breasts, you are a sexual offender. BTW, Freedom of Press does not apply.

Your best bet is to let your lawyer direct everything. Answer specifically what you are asked and don't elaborate. You really come off like a control freak and a jerk, and that will not serve you well in court. You don't want to appear to the judge to be scrutinizing and criticizing every aspect of mother's life since the date you separated. That doesn't help you. You want to appear to be sincere and concerned for your children who are distressed because their mother regularly goes out for social occasions on almost every evening they are with her. That is the crux of your case.
 


singledaddytwo

Junior Member
My then, 11 yr old daughter took the picture the night i watched them at their mothers house thinking it was funny, but unfortunately....I didn't and I kept the picture for future reference. It takes the minds of sick individuals to incinuate what you have.....and I came here for advice????? I want my children protected.......not corrupted and your advice will ..in time, do just that. Thanks but no thanks.

Just an example of how screwed some of you are:

I posted that the picture was of their "backs exposed topless"

The reply" It's illegal to take photos of 15 yr old girls breasts.

Hmmmmmmm, last I witnessed breasts, they were ummmmmmmm, in the front.....I think. Geeessshhhh!!!!
 

Mbarr

Member
singledaddytwo said:
My then, 11 yr old daughter took the picture the night i watched them at their mothers house thinking it was funny, but unfortunately....I didn't and I kept the picture for future reference. It takes the minds of sick individuals to incinuate what you have.....and I came here for advice????? I want my children protected.......not corrupted and your advice will ..in time, do just that. Thanks but no thanks.

Just an example of how screwed some of you are:

I posted that the picture was of their "backs exposed topless"

The reply" It's illegal to take photos of 15 yr old girls breasts.

Hmmmmmmm, last I witnessed breasts, they were ummmmmmmm, in the front.....I think. Geeessshhhh!!!!
I misread your post. Geesshh!!

The rest of the advice is accurate. I do this for a living, you moron.
 

BL

Senior Member
Ya know what Daddio , you know it All , so Quit posting here and Let your Lawyer represent you .

Since you keep coming back and stating what a bunch of Losers and Morons we are , You will NOT have the Last word until you Lock the Thread , which you should defiantly do , Because you can call us morons all you Like , but you will be the Loser in the End .
 
Well, I didn't read all the posts....getting a little too out of hand for my taste. But, I will say this about my own situation....My ex is doing a lot of the same things your ex is doing....at least what I read in first few postings. Got told by an attorney most of it is simply life style choices. But there are a few things that are not simply lifestyle choices. My ex likes to go out with his friends on the weekends he has the kids and drink, sometimes heavily. Then drives them back to his place. One big problem is that he lives with his girlfriend and her son, so they drive around in his 5 passenger vehicle. That makes him not only driving after consuming alcohol(sometimes in excess) but then puts 2 of my 4 children in the hatch area of his SUV while he is driving around. So he is potential over the legal limit alcohol wise, but then has two of the kids unrestrained in the hatch. Secondly, he likes to party (often) with his work buddies. Some of his work buddies have teenage kids. Teens are drinking with the adults at these parties.

My point is this.....I can't do anything about who he is living with, how much he drinks at his house in front of them, who he leaves the kids with when he has something he wants to do, etc. The only two things I can do anything about are the two things listed above. For those two things my attorney suggested that as a first step I request court mediation (a free service through my court system, and also required before a hearing will be allowed). I have already set this up. We have mediation in 2 weeks. If he does not agree to my terms of 1) no more adult oriented drinking parties (that have to be driven home from). 2) a time line of how long he has to wait between last alcoholic drink and actually driving. 3) absolutely no more exposure to underage drinking. Then this will go to a hearing. My two oldest children have become very disheartened with their father. My 12 year old daughter is so tired of her dad's goings on that she has begged me to not make her go over to her dad's anymore and asked if I would do something to make him stop.

If he does not agree to my terms the two oldest kids will be giving depositions to my attorney and I will request a closed door meeting with the judge. My attorney said my ex could very well end up with supervised visitation over these issues. I am hoping it doesn't come to this however.

All the other issues I have with my ex are just that...my issues. I can't change anything he is doing. I am trying my best to raise my kids with the best values I can. I send them to a private Christian school and have tried very hard to show them values and morals through my own lifestyle and feel their dad is very undermining in that respect.

Unless there is something illegal she is doing with the kids there isn't much you can do. Except live with it and let the kids know you are there for them when they need to talk about something that might be confusing to them.
 

tigger22472

Senior Member
Ok.. I'm going to tell you a story and then I'm done here because man you are NOT getting this.

When my husband and his ex split they agreed on the 50/50 (2 week/2week thing). She moved over a hour away and didn't exercise her 2 weeks but on paper that is how it was. A year later she moved back and they began following the court order.

Mom started juggling her own boyfriends, exposing the child this. When the child was four mom got engaged. Child swore to us that her mom was marrying boyfriend A, when in fact she was marrying boyfriend B. Nice huh?
(I came into the picture about 8 months before this)

When child began school rather than a custody battle as we lived a distance away we moved to where mom was living. The next few years went pretty decent because dad pretty much rolled over on the small issues and nothing major came into play.

In 2002 my husband became disabled. He went from making $55,000 a year to NOTHING for a full year until his social security was approved. We had to move from our home and bought a house that was supposed to be in the same elementary district as his daughter. We found out the day before we moved that in fact it wasn't and was in another elementary district. In order to maintain his custody I couldn't work full time days because I have to transport his daughter morning and evening. NOT to mention when mom and step-dad were working too.

Between Feb. 2001- Sept. 2004, mom filed for divorced 4 times from her husband but never stating anything other than she wasn't happy. Step-dad had even called here once stating how he was leaving because she was cheating on him... none of our business and daughter wasn't being neglected.

In July 2004 my husband went to his ex with a simple modification. He asked to transfer daughter to our school (seeing as she was here his two weeks and 2-3 days a week of mom's time), he asked to change the insurance requirements (in the original both parents were required to carry insurance, he could not do that being disabled), he asked for a move-away clause and a few other minor things. All SS monies his daughter had received had gone into an account in daughter and mom's name that had been there previously. My husband had believed this would be used as it should be but mom refused so he asked for half of it, leaving her the other half ($8,000 total). The largest thing was the school change. Mom agreed to everything. She then called that night saying "You mean to take this to court?" My husband told her yes and that it was just a formality. She convinced him she could be trusted and there was no need. Two days later she handed him a sealed envelope refusing to change the school in the upcoming year. She proceeded to do a few other things also.

Husband redid the modification and filed it in court. Nearly everything was STANDARD things. I also might add that the school we wanted the child to go to was only .8 miles from mom and we lived 4 miles from both schools, only one provided a bus to.

While in court several issues were brought. My husband mentioned how mom CONTINUALLY puts the child in sports without consulting him and that he disagreed with some as his daughters school work was starting to fail and she was having behavior problems. He had the behavior reports from school to back him up. Judge told him it was none of his business. Judge told him mom couldn't force him to take her on his time and what she did on her time was her business.

He mentioned she had retained a babysitter. He was not arguing the fact she had one as he agreed that if mom was going to be at work a few more hours after school a babysitter was a good idea as it saved us extra trips to town. What he did argue is that he was made aware of this person through his daughter and had no idea who she was. Again, Judge told him, none of his business.

He argued that when she left town and went on vacation that not only did she not allow him to know, she didn't even allow her sister or mother to know (who we know and keep in touch with) to allow there to be some way to get in touch in case of emergency. This came about because she e-mailed him one day stating she was going on vacation and that he could call her cell phone but she wasn't sure that it would work, of which it didn't we later found out.

The judge refused to put specific times for pick up and drop off. He refused the move away clause, he did grant the insurance, and instead issuing each parent could alternate tax years (long story on how their original was) he ordered mom could claim her every single year. And, oh yeah, refused to change the school, even though he himself was surprised that our house wasn't in that district and understood why we were told it was. The only things he even ordered was the tax issue (against him), the insurance, and that mom could keep half the money in the account from SS (she had given half to him but during all the prep he had decided to try for all based on other things she'd done... like going to SS and making herself the payee).

He told my husband that he had too much time on his hands and repeatedly told him what went on in mom's home was "NONE" of his business. He also repeatedly said "If you guys can't get along then someone needs to file for full custody." Now, I realize this is what you think you are going to file for. My point is that we had over 100 pieces of evidence proving the things going on in mom's home and her actions, my husband had EVERY single answer that judge asked at the tip of his fingers. When that judge asked him what teacher his daughter had that year and previous years, he rattled them off, as well as teachers our sons had in previous years.

The judge did remind my husband (not that he already knew) that he could file for child support against mom. But again, repeatedly said if they couldn't agree someone should file for custody. Mom got EVERY SINGLE thing she wanted, he wouldn't even change the school, do you really think that judge would have given him custody? Other than the school and the SS money EVERY thing in that modification was STANDARD and my husband walked out of there with less than he had when he walked in.

To top all of this off, mom went to court with her husband. Well, at least we thought it was her husband. They were there together, they were holding hands, nothing seemed unusual. Four days later her husband moved out, they had been divorced for over two months already! They never went in front of a judge, however, the judge we saw was the judge that signed off on her divorce. My husband had even been in there arguing the point that mom had two drivers in her household compared to the one in ours and there she was divorced, KNOWING he was moving out.

Husband moved out on Tuesday, boyfriend moved in on Wednesday. He lasted 4 months and now he's gone. Do you really think my husband thinks THIS is morally right? HELL NO. He's worked with his daughter to help her work through her feelings on it.

If he were to file for custody and won he wouldn't be able to prevent what goes on in mom's house, it would continue but his daughter would see less of it yes. But then that grass looks greener. My husband is not willing to risk taking it to court and losing and then his daughter be exposed to it FULL TIME.

Custody battles are a crap shoot and the fact that you are a man works against you the second you step foot in that courtroom.

The stuff you have mentioned here is not going to be enough to change custody to you and it's too big of a risk in my opinion.
 

BL

Senior Member
Geeze Brief Gals Briefs LOl ....

I don't want to see movies . Of Days of your Lives .. :eek:
 

singledaddytwo

Junior Member
Ohhhhh myyy, how the world turns. It is with GREAT PLEASURE that I advise ALL of you that the mother called this afternoon advising that she is willing to go to court tomorrow morning to relinquish ALL her rights to "our " children. She claims that she is "not ready to be a parent"......GO FIGURE....after 4 children. She itemized the EXACT things I posted as to my complaints with her as reason for her decision. She claims that she cannot give up the drinking, the partying etc and that I AM THE GREATEST FATHER SHE HAS EVER MET AND KNOWS I WILL TAKE GREAT CARE OF HER CHILDREN. Some may say...but it isn't Mondayty morning yet but my response is that with this SIGNED LETTER in hand, I have the upperhand here. You see, regardless of what I have against her being admissable in a court room, the bottom line is, she "hides" this image from EVERYONE she knows and a court preceding would expose this "image" to everyone in the room. HER IMAGE IS NOW AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN MORE IMPORTANT THAN HER CHILDREN and she will never in a million years dispute that. I am not a control freak of what SHE does but if it sets a bad example for my daughters you can bet your sweet AZZ that I will step in and do whatever necessary to stop it. Just like letting my 4 yr old watch Freddie Kruger movies............no brains I tell ya. Call me controlling, call me moron, call me idiot but one thing NO ONE will ever in this lifetime accuse me of is being an uncaring father and every other name I could be called is petty vs being called an uncaring father....to me. So I guess I did get the last word afterall. This wasn't a competition to me running this thread but knowing I wasn't wrong in my accusations and knowing I wasn't willing to accept the "lay down" approach everyone was recommending, I had no choice but to come back and argue the posts.

ALL I EVER HEAR IN CHILD CUSTODY RELATED CASES THAT I HAVE SAT IN AND LISTENED TO IS " JUDGES CONCERNS ARE WHAT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD" If this is true coming from a judge, how in the hell can they justify subjecting a child to the corruption a parent with no values / morals will subject them to? It seems, if the posts are correct, that a judge would rather just do whatever creates less paperwork.

Sommeone says that FREEDOM OF PRESS does not apply? I beg to differ with you on that as I've done it many times to fight traffic tickets, and posted two articles regarding the sentencing of a relative of HERS in the past and all articles posted resulted in VERY REWARDING results.

Hell, maybe she was on here reading the posts....never thought of that, but then again, haven't said anything here I haven't already told her sooooo....

I love this quote "IF YOU DON'T STAND FOR SOMETHING, YOU'LL FALL FOR ANYTHING!!"
 
"Custody battles are a crap shoot and the fact that you are a man works against you the second you step foot in that courtroom. "

"The stuff you have mentioned here is not going to be enough to change custody to you and it's too big of a risk in my opinion.[/QUOTE]"

I thought I would reply to these statements. Yes, I honestly do believe men are at a very big disadvantage in court. But, I might add that my husband has sole legal/physical custody of his two children. Mom had sole legal/physical custody and lived in a different state than we do. My husband filed change of custody in June of 2004. Received temporary physical custody in August of 2004. Just received legal/physical custody 3 weeks ago. Mom has a grand total of 3 weeks visitation per year (1 week Christmas, 2 weeks summer). In our home state only.

Of course, my husband really had nothing to lose by going to court. Since we were living on opposite coasts from the kids and had 1 week Christmas and 8 weeks summer visitation. He didn't feel it could possibly get any worse than that and the judge gave him everything. Even allowing him to remove the kids from their home state.

So, sometimes dad's to win in court. My husband's ex is a total loser in the child rearing department which played bigtime in my husband receiving custody. I don't remember reading how old OP's children are, but my husband's children had a closed door meeting with the judge and attornies from both side only. The kids at the time were 7 and 12. My husband purchased a transcript of the hearing and according to what I read, the judge made her custody change decision based on what the 7 year old girl had to say. She told the judge she wanted to live her mother but told the judge exactly the same things the 12 year old boy told the judge about life in mom's house.
 

tigger22472

Senior Member
mom6stepmom2 said:
"Custody battles are a crap shoot and the fact that you are a man works against you the second you step foot in that courtroom. "

"The stuff you have mentioned here is not going to be enough to change custody to you and it's too big of a risk in my opinion."

I thought I would reply to these statements. Yes, I honestly do believe men are at a very big disadvantage in court. But, I might add that my husband has sole legal/physical custody of his two children. Mom had sole legal/physical custody and lived in a different state than we do. My husband filed change of custody in June of 2004. Received temporary physical custody in August of 2004. Just received legal/physical custody 3 weeks ago. Mom has a grand total of 3 weeks visitation per year (1 week Christmas, 2 weeks summer). In our home state only.

Of course, my husband really had nothing to lose by going to court. Since we were living on opposite coasts from the kids and had 1 week Christmas and 8 weeks summer visitation. He didn't feel it could possibly get any worse than that and the judge gave him everything. Even allowing him to remove the kids from their home state.

So, sometimes dad's to win in court. My husband's ex is a total loser in the child rearing department which played bigtime in my husband receiving custody. I don't remember reading how old OP's children are, but my husband's children had a closed door meeting with the judge and attornies from both side only. The kids at the time were 7 and 12. My husband purchased a transcript of the hearing and according to what I read, the judge made her custody change decision based on what the 7 year old girl had to say. She told the judge she wanted to live her mother but told the judge exactly the same things the 12 year old boy told the judge about life in mom's house.

I agree that it's possible that men do get custody and that it does happen, and I agree that really your husband had nothing to lose in trying, I am just saying that they are hard enough as it is. Besides, I HONESTLY believe that it takes more for a man to get custody than it does for a woman.
 
Last edited:

singledaddytwo

Junior Member
Happy ending

Well folks, I am back home with the legal documents in hand indicating that I, the father of my 2 children have all the rights any “good” father could possibly want with his children. When asked if she wanted ANY visitation, her response was, “ Well, no because I think it is best that I dissolve myself from their life entirely so they may forget about me and my incompetent behavior as their mother”. I must say that the forum has taught me one valuable lesson and that would be that “ The justice system is solely responsible for creating the many issues surrounding the troubled youth in our society.” I was being told over and over again that “because of the justice system, I had no basis for pulling my children from her”. HER being a mother who voluntarily relinquished her rights. So in essence, without her doing that at her own free will, if the courts would not have listened to my case , as everyone had suggested they wouldn’t, and gave me primary custody, she would have been yet another mother in this world who : 1) has children she really doesn’t want, 2) would rather have the children then pay child support, 3) has the children for the sole purpose of screwing the “good “ father and 4) has the children because society as a whole feels the mother is ALWAYS the better parent. When a mothers and fathers lifestyle are as OPPOSITE as day and night, how can that not be considered “BAD FOR THE CHILDREN” not to mention confusing as hell? I was told that you can’t use “lifestyle choices as a basis for a case against the mother” Well geeeessshhh…..a friggin cult is a lifestyle choice, pornography is a lifestyle choice, having a gang bang in her living room is a lifestyle choice and if any judge in this world would tell me that these items are not applicable in basing my request to have them pulled from their mother, I would flat out tell that judge he was a worthless pile of S**T and would bet damn good money that he would NEVER allow his children to associate with mine if he knew they were being subjected to this kind of “lifestyle”. LIFESTYLES ARE WHAT CREATES THE END PRODUCT OF CHILDREN. Why in the hell is that not an issue when determining the “better setting for the children”? So lets see, a mother……gets up in the morning, pops the top on a beer can, smokes a joint, sits around all day half naked in her chair smoking dope eating chips jamming to loud Rock and Roll music, living on welfare….that’s her l.ifestyle. The father, gets up in the morning, drinks his coffee, gets a shower, feeds the children breakfast, takes them to the daycare, works all day, comes home after picking up the children, feeds them dinner, goes out to the park for the evening, comes home gives the children a bath and tucks them into bed……that’s his lifestyle. It is a SAD DAY IN AMERICA when LIFESTYLES of two individual adults are not taken into consideration when determining who the children should be granted to as the primary caretaker. Again , it takes a RESPONSIBLE parent to make a GOOD parent. Lifestyles can and do separate the good from the bad. Hearing what I have heard in this forum gives me ample reason to believe that the laws surrounding child custody need to be changed in a BIG WAY. Parents of children who are still living in their “childhood” meaning that they are immature, irresponsible, unfocused etc are parents who deserve absolutely no pity in my book when determining the better parent if a divorce or split-up is inevitable. My life changed entirely the very second my first daughter was born. Too many out there look at childbirth as an “event” rather than the “life changing” experience it REALLY IS and REALLY NEEDS to be if your goal is to be a “good parent”. Children come with many sacrifices the parents need to adhere to. If the parent is incapable or unwilling to adhere and adjust to these sacrifices than that SAME parent does not deserve to be a parent. THE LAWS NEED TO CHANGE FOR THE SAKE OF THIS COUNTRYS YOUTH. Ohhhh, and sorry for sounding like I was making this a "Dear Abby" forum but the responses from people who know the law made me realize that the laws are unfair and unjust but most importantly....UNBELIEVABLE!!
 

BL

Senior Member
singledaddytwo said:
Well folks, I am back home with the legal documents in hand indicating that I, the father of my 2 children have all the rights any “good” father could possibly want with his children. When asked if she wanted ANY visitation, her response was, “ Well, no because I think it is best that I dissolve myself from their life entirely so they may forget about me and my incompetent behavior as their mother”. I must say that the forum has taught me one valuable lesson and that would be that “ The justice system is solely responsible for creating the many issues surrounding the troubled youth in our society.” I was being told over and over again that “because of the justice system, I had no basis for pulling my children from her”. HER being a mother who voluntarily relinquished her rights. So in essence, without her doing that at her own free will, if the courts would not have listened to my case , as everyone had suggested they wouldn’t, and gave me primary custody, she would have been yet another mother in this world who : 1) has children she really doesn’t want, 2) would rather have the children then pay child support, 3) has the children for the sole purpose of screwing the “good “ father and 4) has the children because society as a whole feels the mother is ALWAYS the better parent. When a mothers and fathers lifestyle are as OPPOSITE as day and night, how can that not be considered “BAD FOR THE CHILDREN” not to mention confusing as hell? I was told that you can’t use “lifestyle choices as a basis for a case against the mother” Well geeeessshhh…..a friggin cult is a lifestyle choice, pornography is a lifestyle choice, having a gang bang in her living room is a lifestyle choice and if any judge in this world would tell me that these items are not applicable in basing my request to have them pulled from their mother, I would flat out tell that judge he was a worthless pile of S**T and would bet damn good money that he would NEVER allow his children to associate with mine if he knew they were being subjected to this kind of “lifestyle”. LIFESTYLES ARE WHAT CREATES THE END PRODUCT OF CHILDREN. Why in the hell is that not an issue when determining the “better setting for the children”? So lets see, a mother……gets up in the morning, pops the top on a beer can, smokes a joint, sits around all day half naked in her chair smoking dope eating chips jamming to loud Rock and Roll music, living on welfare….that’s her l.ifestyle. The father, gets up in the morning, drinks his coffee, gets a shower, feeds the children breakfast, takes them to the daycare, works all day, comes home after picking up the children, feeds them dinner, goes out to the park for the evening, comes home gives the children a bath and tucks them into bed……that’s his lifestyle. It is a SAD DAY IN AMERICA when LIFESTYLES of two individual adults are not taken into consideration when determining who the children should be granted to as the primary caretaker. Again , it takes a RESPONSIBLE parent to make a GOOD parent. Lifestyles can and do separate the good from the bad. Hearing what I have heard in this forum gives me ample reason to believe that the laws surrounding child custody need to be changed in a BIG WAY. Parents of children who are still living in their “childhood” meaning that they are immature, irresponsible, unfocused etc are parents who deserve absolutely no pity in my book when determining the better parent if a divorce or split-up is inevitable. My life changed entirely the very second my first daughter was born. Too many out there look at childbirth as an “event” rather than the “life changing” experience it REALLY IS and REALLY NEEDS to be if your goal is to be a “good parent”. Children come with many sacrifices the parents need to adhere to. If the parent is incapable or unwilling to adhere and adjust to these sacrifices than that SAME parent does not deserve to be a parent. THE LAWS NEED TO CHANGE FOR THE SAKE OF THIS COUNTRYS YOUTH. Ohhhh, and sorry for sounding like I was making this a "Dear Abby" forum but the responses from people who know the law made me realize that the laws are unfair and unjust but most importantly....UNBELIEVABLE!!
Maybe your local News Paper editorial will print your opinions .

Here I thought that you were an upstanding to do .

Ever hear of Yours thoughts are your Actions ?

Gee what trashy talk . Oh don't worry , I don't believe for one minute you're are the Perfect Parent you make yourself out to be ...

If you think you have fooled us , you have not .

Good day ....
 

casa

Senior Member
singledaddytwo said:
My then, 11 yr old daughter took the picture the night i watched them at their mothers house thinking it was funny, but unfortunately....I didn't and I kept the picture for future reference.
Hmmm...did you notice you just admitted to letting the young man sleep over with your daugher while YOU were watching them? And you obviously weren't supervising your 11 yr. old if she's sneaking into bedrooms taking pictures of her teenage sister and her boyfriend.

If you really did not agree (rather than just looking for things to use against the Mother)...then why didn't you kick the young man's behind out the door? Then tell your 11 yr old to brush her teeth and go to bed? :rolleyes:
 

singledaddytwo

Junior Member
Ya know, first of all, I could care less about YOUR opinion of me. You don't know me, just like the judges who make unjust decisions that don't know the individual person that gets the raw deal. Society has taught us to believe that FATHERS are not adequate enough to raise their children by themselves because SOCIETY as a whole has the mentality of a "rock". Most can't think for themselves and need other people to run their lives for them. I DON'T. Just for instance, if I was put in front of a woman judge who had a man put her through the mill in her own personal situation..I would be a sitting duck just because I am a man. If I was put in front of a male judge who's sister was taken through the mud by her ex, I would again ....be a sitting duck, because I'm a man. Women and men alike label the opposite sex based on personal experiences....judges and attorneys are no different. Someone's quote on here is "If at first you don't succeed, failure may be your thing". HAAAAAAA, ADVICE FORUM??? I was always taught if at first you don't succeed, TRY AGAIN, but just like so many in this forum were asking me to GIVE UP, I refused and look what it got me. You can think of me what you want but the TRUTH IS, Regardless of how good or bad of a parent I am...IN YOUR EYES, THE CHILDRENS OWN MOTHER, you know, the one who is considered the "BEST" parent by society, is the one who RELINQUISHED HER RIGHTS WITH NO FIGHTING ON MY PART. She just knows I am one with convictions and I don't and won't lie under a rock for NOBODY if my beliefs are strong enough to argue. Do I always have to be right? No , I don't and am not afraid to admit when I'm wrong which I have done on many occasions, but with every breath in my body I would debate you on WHO IS THE BETTER PARENT HERE and regardless of how much LAW KNOWLEDGE YOU HAVE, I would win. The reason you find it so hard to believe that I am a good father is because you yourself as a parent probably suck or you don't even have children. Or........I am not a good father to you because you, high and mighty lawman/woman gave pisspoor advice and can't admit to that. Go ahead, keep telling the guys to give up in fighting for the children they TRULY love and be part of the MANY who will run the children in society in the ground as a result.Maybe then you can add your name to the list of many who are RESPONSIBLE for the outcome of the children who followed their drug addicted, alcoholic, partying mamas footseps. Something to be REAL PROUD OF HUH? Everyone wants to say that children do this and do that because they were "raised around it" but yet lifestyles don't play a part in deciding what is in "the best interest of the child". Regardless of how "trashy" I talk, my children are not watching me TYPE this and I certainly don't cuss in front of them ...........and certainly wouldn't BRAG about it if I did....like some here have. Ya know, I somehow knew that YOU would be the one to POST a negative reply to my outcome.....simply because I didn't BOW DOWN to your advice from the get-go, and pity any who do. Sure laws are laws but laws can be changed if enough people would get a backbone and make it happen instead of just thinkin, " Hmmmmm, so thats the norm". Thats what you call a "dictatorship" My constitutional rights in this country have taken me a long way and you nor anyone else will get me to "roll over" and look the other way just because it has "worked" for so many others NOT like me. I take great pride in being a parent and taking your ill advice would have went against everything I stand for where parenting is concerned so go find someone else with a similar situation.paint him up with rosy cheeks, lipstick , a fat red nose and a goofy hat and see if he will take your advice. He'd have to be a clown.....just so happens , I'm not. And you do this for a living? It would be wonderful to go back and see the results of past advice you have given. I live by the saying "YOUR LIFE SITUATION IS A RESULT OF DECISIONS YOU HAVE MADE IN YOUR LIFE" If advice you are given does not seem like it is good advice..Don't take it, because most times, it's not.
 

BL

Senior Member
singledaddytwo said:
Ya know, first of all, I could care less about YOUR opinion of me. You don't know me, just like the judges who make unjust decisions that don't know the individual person that gets the raw deal. Society has taught us to believe that FATHERS are not adequate enough to raise their children by themselves because SOCIETY as a whole has the mentality of a "rock". Most can't think for themselves and need other people to run their lives for them. I DON'T. Just for instance, if I was put in front of a woman judge who had a man put her through the mill in her own personal situation..I would be a sitting duck just because I am a man. If I was put in front of a male judge who's sister was taken through the mud by her ex, I would again ....be a sitting duck, because I'm a man. Women and men alike label the opposite sex based on personal experiences....judges and attorneys are no different. Someone's quote on here is "If at first you don't succeed, failure may be your thing". HAAAAAAA, ADVICE FORUM??? I was always taught if at first you don't succeed, TRY AGAIN, but just like so many in this forum were asking me to GIVE UP, I refused and look what it got me. You can think of me what you want but the TRUTH IS, Regardless of how good or bad of a parent I am...IN YOUR EYES, THE CHILDRENS OWN MOTHER, you know, the one who is considered the "BEST" parent by society, is the one who RELINQUISHED HER RIGHTS WITH NO FIGHTING ON MY PART. She just knows I am one with convictions and I don't and won't lie under a rock for NOBODY if my beliefs are strong enough to argue. Do I always have to be right? No , I don't and am not afraid to admit when I'm wrong which I have done on many occasions, but with every breath in my body I would debate you on WHO IS THE BETTER PARENT HERE and regardless of how much LAW KNOWLEDGE YOU HAVE, I would win. The reason you find it so hard to believe that I am a good father is because you yourself as a parent probably suck or you don't even have children. Or........I am not a good father to you because you, high and mighty lawman/woman gave pisspoor advice and can't admit to that. Go ahead, keep telling the guys to give up in fighting for the children they TRULY love and be part of the MANY who will run the children in society in the ground as a result.Maybe then you can add your name to the list of many who are RESPONSIBLE for the outcome of the children who followed their drug addicted, alcoholic, partying mamas footseps. Something to be REAL PROUD OF HUH? Everyone wants to say that children do this and do that because they were "raised around it" but yet lifestyles don't play a part in deciding what is in "the best interest of the child". Regardless of how "trashy" I talk, my children are not watching me TYPE this and I certainly don't cuss in front of them ...........and certainly wouldn't BRAG about it if I did....like some here have. Ya know, I somehow knew that YOU would be the one to POST a negative reply to my outcome.....simply because I didn't BOW DOWN to your advice from the get-go, and pity any who do. Sure laws are laws but laws can be changed if enough people would get a backbone and make it happen instead of just thinkin, " Hmmmmm, so thats the norm". Thats what you call a "dictatorship" My constitutional rights in this country have taken me a long way and you nor anyone else will get me to "roll over" and look the other way just because it has "worked" for so many others NOT like me. I take great pride in being a parent and taking your ill advice would have went against everything I stand for where parenting is concerned so go find someone else with a similar situation.paint him up with rosy cheeks, lipstick , a fat red nose and a goofy hat and see if he will take your advice. He'd have to be a clown.....just so happens , I'm not. And you do this for a living? It would be wonderful to go back and see the results of past advice you have given. I live by the saying "YOUR LIFE SITUATION IS A RESULT OF DECISIONS YOU HAVE MADE IN YOUR LIFE" If advice you are given does not seem like it is good advice..Don't take it, because most times, it's not.
Gibberish , for someone that wrote articles you can't even type paragraphs .

You rant and rant and rant , on and on . Does it make you feel big , or you just dumping your garbage here ?

Ha Ha HA Ha I bet you're getting the Hee Haw out of this .

Go take your meds now ..

Oh we need some more people in SOCIETY that are Stuck up Conceded individuals that are ALWAYS Right , to put the rest of US in SOCIETY down .

Look AZZHOLE the Laws may not be perfect , and I know from experience , but don't come here with your trashy mouth against the Members .

Please do us a favor and pick on some other site .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top