What is the name of your state? TX
A husband has an IRA where he designates his wife as a primary beneficiary entitled to 55% and his child as a secondary beneficiary entitled to 45%. Husband and wife divorce, thus invalidating the wife's designation per the IRA agreement. Husband never redesignates a beneficiary to take over the 55%. Husband thereafter remarries and then dies. The widow is arguing that she should receive the 55% since the ex-wife's share is void. The child is arguing that the 55% passes to her because she is a surviving beneficiary. The widow is stating that by allocating the percentage of 45% to the daughter, the decedent intended to limit her distribution to that amount. The daughter is arguing that the decedent could have redesignated the new wife as beneficiary and never did and that the 45% is no longer applicable since the ex-wife's share is void. Any thoughts on who is right?
A husband has an IRA where he designates his wife as a primary beneficiary entitled to 55% and his child as a secondary beneficiary entitled to 45%. Husband and wife divorce, thus invalidating the wife's designation per the IRA agreement. Husband never redesignates a beneficiary to take over the 55%. Husband thereafter remarries and then dies. The widow is arguing that she should receive the 55% since the ex-wife's share is void. The child is arguing that the 55% passes to her because she is a surviving beneficiary. The widow is stating that by allocating the percentage of 45% to the daughter, the decedent intended to limit her distribution to that amount. The daughter is arguing that the decedent could have redesignated the new wife as beneficiary and never did and that the 45% is no longer applicable since the ex-wife's share is void. Any thoughts on who is right?