FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.
The judge could say something to the prosecutor. He doesn't have to say anything directly to the prosecutor when giving his reason(s) for dismissal.
As Just Blue noted, we really don't discuss hypotheticals on this forum. They can veer off into too many directions. This forum is designed to help people with their real problems.
In almost every instance the judge may dismiss the case without first getting input from the prosecutor if the judge already has sufficient information to know that a dismissal is warranted. But the details of the particular case matter, of course.
Your apparent reluctance to accept as correct the negative answer received might suggest a preconceived notion that the trial court has no volition in such matters and must first obtain the concurrence of the state before dismissing criminal charges or directing a verdict of acquittal.
However, I suspect that it isn't a predisposition at all, but arises from a specific incident. Would you care to explain?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.