The Local Rules of Civil Procedure do not allow for Discovery to be filed with the Court.
I am Pro Se and I filed my Initial Disclosures along with an Exhibit 44 (showing a calculation of damages in Oct 2017) with the Clerk and the Court Ordered the Initial Disclosures removed.
Fast forward to July 2018, I just filed a Memorandum in Response Def. Motion to Dismiss, and in that Response was a new Exhibit 44 (Doc. 55-1, Pl. Exhibit 44). And the just last week (Aug 2018) I filed a Memorandum in Response Def. Motion for Summary Judgment and I referenced the Oct 2017 Exhibit 44 which was ordered removed.
I immediately Motioned the Court to allow the Oct 2107 Exhibit 44, which was granted today,
I am Pro Se and I filed my Initial Disclosures along with an Exhibit 44 (showing a calculation of damages in Oct 2017) with the Clerk and the Court Ordered the Initial Disclosures removed.
Fast forward to July 2018, I just filed a Memorandum in Response Def. Motion to Dismiss, and in that Response was a new Exhibit 44 (Doc. 55-1, Pl. Exhibit 44). And the just last week (Aug 2018) I filed a Memorandum in Response Def. Motion for Summary Judgment and I referenced the Oct 2017 Exhibit 44 which was ordered removed.
I immediately Motioned the Court to allow the Oct 2107 Exhibit 44, which was granted today,
But now there are two Exhibit 44s. I am wondering if anyone has a suggestion as to how to suggest a way to differentiate between the two exhibits?TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting [57] Motion to Allow Omitted Exhibit Text of Order: The Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Exhibit 44 shall be considered as an exhibit in support of the Plaintiff's Memorandum in Response to Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. So Ordered.