What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Massachusetts
I recently was laid off by my employer and had the option to continue my health insurance plan with COBRA, which I took. Over the next 3 months I paid my COBRA payments to my former employer with the knowledge I was covered. The checks were being cashed on regular basis, so I didn't think twice. I then received a letter from the insurance provider stating that in fact that my policy had been terminated due to non payment by my former employer, dating back to 2 months from the time I received the notification. So for at least 2 months, my former employer has been taking and cashing my COBRA checks without making payments on the insurance policy and not notifying me of the situation.
When confronted with the fact that my claims from this now uninsured period would now not be covered, the former employer offered to pay me for the amount of my claims during this time, knowing that it would be far cheaper then to pay the amount required by the provider to reinstate coverage for the 2 months of non-payment.
My question is, by proposing this, was my former employer asking me to engage in a form of insurance fraud? or at the very least, an unethical arrangement?
Thanks so much
I recently was laid off by my employer and had the option to continue my health insurance plan with COBRA, which I took. Over the next 3 months I paid my COBRA payments to my former employer with the knowledge I was covered. The checks were being cashed on regular basis, so I didn't think twice. I then received a letter from the insurance provider stating that in fact that my policy had been terminated due to non payment by my former employer, dating back to 2 months from the time I received the notification. So for at least 2 months, my former employer has been taking and cashing my COBRA checks without making payments on the insurance policy and not notifying me of the situation.
When confronted with the fact that my claims from this now uninsured period would now not be covered, the former employer offered to pay me for the amount of my claims during this time, knowing that it would be far cheaper then to pay the amount required by the provider to reinstate coverage for the 2 months of non-payment.
My question is, by proposing this, was my former employer asking me to engage in a form of insurance fraud? or at the very least, an unethical arrangement?
Thanks so much
Last edited: