Evidence at trial/Miss Trial"

[J-Cat]

CALIFORNIA Defendant allowed statements and physical evidence on good faith to be admitted at trial because they were lead to believe Officer X was going to testify to establish link between co-defendants. Testimony from Officer P. stated, "Co-defendant is down the street in get away car, the suspect running in that direction." Officer A collected evidence at crime scene, went into Co-defendant's car found a small make-up bag full of small tools, a phone book with defendant's name in it, defendant's cell phone, and a screw driver. The DA admitted these as the link between defendant and co-defendant. They instructed the jury that Officer X would show how he stopped Co-defendant and detained him/her for burglary. Officer X never testified to establish link.

What actions can I take to obtain release at this point before sentencing? Do I file a motion? Can I declaim my Bentley motion after the trial before sentencing? Can I file a 995 motion before sentencing? Set a side verdict? Do I File a writ of brobhition / mandamus? (sp?) Anything I know they are going for max sentence. Also with the evidence admitted but no testimony to establish link how will that effect co-defendant? That trial is coming up too. Any direction would be helpful. Very little time before sentencing. Thank You.

 

[Paraska36]

you thought you got a reply didn't you! haha. Nobody will reply to my message either.

 

[whipsnake]

excuse me for asking, but you must have an attourney and you sound versed in law at least enough to que him Why did your attourney allow unsubstantiated evidence to be admitted at all.. sounds like another drew carey attourney at law to me is your attourney sleeping with the prosecuter,or despaately wanting to?

 

[J-Cat]

The attorney that allowed the evidence is the PD. Trial Attorney and the other attorney we already know is working for the DA. He has with held information, given the wrong information and has presured the co-defendent to plea guilty so that the DA would have a slam dunk case against the defendent. They are here for the politics, the game, money and big brownie points to get the repeat offender. This case should never have made it to jury trial. They all get their paycheck from the same place win or loss, the county.
I don't always know why they do what they do but manipulation of the law and direct misrepresentation from the ones we are taught from grade school are the "good guys" makes me want to trust a thief more. I have no respect anymore for the police, the DA and some attorneys. I am lucky enought to have many attorney friends I can ask questions of but none practice in this county. Thanks