nheffington
Junior Member
I am helping a friend with his paperwork for a family relations case. In May 2009 he lost his job. In June he petitioned to modify his child support payments. In October they finally held the trial. After showing proof of keeping current with his payments, proof of losing his job, and proof of the Mother's increase in income, the court ordered that Father's child support payments increase. The increase was based on a worksheet submitted by the Attorney Generals Office. The Father pointed out that the parenting time on the sheet was incorrect and the AG and Mother even stated in open court that they had used a temporary order to calculate the child support but the judge still ordered the increased payments. What's up with that? Is this just a blatant disregard for any and all of the Father's testimony or am I missing something?