Essentially, as it says, a summary judgment assumes all your claims are true, but that they do not lead to a legal claim of action. The first one was that you want damages for the records-keeping violations. The statutes do not provide for that. While the government requires them to keep those records, the failure to do so is between the government and the employer, you don't get to sue over that.
Similarly, they point out that there's no cause in the law for to recover anything for being subject to duress. Duress only becomes an issue when trying to defend against someone making a claim against you.
For the Emotional Distress claim, the issue is that you say that there was emotional distress, but you don't provide any indication as to what that is. You can't say "I'm distressed." You have to couch in the psychological terms that fit the defintion of what the law provides for.
You also make a claim under a federal law that only applies to the state (or people acting for the state). Since the defendant was only acting for the feds, you cant use this.
You claim conspiracy, but you named a single corporation. A corporation can not conspire with itself. Its employees are free to "strategize" within the corporations.
Your explanation of the history doesn't show you were fired in retaliation to a complaint.
On the REDA claim, you failed to follow the proper procedure. You need to follow the proper due process.
As Q points out, your minimum wage and overtime claims will proceed.