• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

File with EEOC or wait? sorry--this is long

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

What is the name of your state?What is the name of your state?What is the name of your state? Texas

I worked for a city government, and during my employment my job description changed several times, which I have documentation of this. I was told to create a website, which I did. However, this had to be done on my own time as the employer gave me no software or time to accomplish this during work hours. I was eventually written up for a small issue involving the website. I filed a grievance asking that it be removed from my file AND asking for back pay regarding all design work I had done off the clock but had been required to do within the scope of my job. Initially I had looked at this as a donation or volunteer work, but didn't realize at the time, I could not do that. In my grievance I cited FLSA statutes to this affect.

Here is where the big problem started - my direct supervisor was not allowed to attend the grievance hearing; he was made to sit outside the meeting for 2-1/2 hours. When we both returned to work, he was MAD and called me into a meeting. He told me he was going to change my work schedule and asked me how I would respond.

Changing my schedule would have me working alone in a remote industrial part of town for a full day, which I had been told would not happen. Besides the fact that I was not qualified for this type of work – I was a secretary, not management. The building posed EXTREMELY HIGH security risks as it was located on an International Airport apron with direct and unsecured access. Additionally, I was not trained in handling emergency type situations regarding patrons of the establishment and there had been patrons injured in the past, as well as the fire alarm did not summons the fire department or alert any agency. I had already brought up ALL these issues previous to this day and it was agreed between me, my immediate supervisor and his supervisor that I would not be required to supervise operations or be left alone in this building when it was open to the public. This job was a lateral transfer from another department within the organization. At the same job level/description, I was never allowed to be in that department alone, and that building was totally locked down to the public.

Not wanting to be put in a vulnerable spot with regards to Security risks that I felt would somehow be used against me, my response to his question was “I would give my 2 weeks notice”. I felt staying would jeopardize my employment and my personal safety due to the security risks involved and I didn't feel competent to handle the responsibilities as I was not management and not qualified as set forth in my job description.

The next day he changed my schedule, since he knew I would quit. He was so mad at me, he wanted me gone. Additionally, during the course of employment he would ask me to hide certain things I was working on or keep quite about certain issues and I would tell him he was out of place asking me to do so. He told a co-worker he needed a younger person in my position so they would know who was boss and would do anything he asked them to do. I left after 2 weeks and I was replaced with a younger person. I also filed another internal grievance to this affect prior to leaving, which has yet to be heard - they are still working on the first grievance – I left in October 2004. :rolleyes:

I called my EEOC office and was told I most likely had a good claim for age discrimination as well as inconsistent behavior. Since I had filed a claim involving FLSA and my schedule seemed to be changed as a direct result of such. EEOC said if other ee's had filed FLSA claims and their schedules had not been changed as a result of filing their claims, then I was discriminated against - he also said since I was over 40 it was age discrimination too and that I had 300 days to file a claim.

I have hired a lawyer, but have filed no claims - either with the Labor Board or EEOC. I was hoping to settle this with the employer but the 2 meetings we have had so far have been circle jerks - they either don't know the law (their lawyer just sits and says nothing) or they are idiots. My direct supervisor is never allowed to attend the meetings. And his supervisor is very combative with me in these meetings. They acknowledge I did the work on my own time but don't want to pay me because it would set a precedent for the many other employees working off the clock to collect for time worked as well!

I'm not sure where to turn now - there are other issues cropping up such as copyrights and royalties. I'm not sure these issues are within the scope of my lawyers knowledge, and he is hesitant to discuss anything related to EEOC or discrimination. Any advice or insight would be appreciated! Thank you!
 


Beth3

Senior Member
Your primary claim here seems to be under the FLSA - that your job was improperly classified as exempt and you were not paid overtime as required by that law and further, that retaliation occurred when you asked for your FLSA status to be reviewed. None of this has anything to do with the EEOC. Your State's Department of Labor and the federal DOL enforce wage and hour laws.

Personally, I don't see a claim for age discrimination here as none of this occurred because of your age; only because you raised the FLSA issue. However if you have an attorney, you need to rely upon his or her advice. He/she is much more familiar with all the details of your situation and in a much better position to advise you.
 
Thank you for your response.

I would have totally agreed with you until the DOL told me to call the EEOC and after speaking with EEOC, the guy there tells me he thinks I have a claim! Could have knocked me over with a feather - I wouldn't have thought it was discrimination and certainly not age either, but would you argue with an EEOC employee who gave me his name/number and said call if I had any more questions?

I was classified as non-exempt (which was proper classification as a secretary) and while they acknowledge my working off the clock and that they used and continue to use the materials, they don't want to pay, because then all the other non-exempt employees that are working off the clock might want to get paid. I was dumbfounded when this comment was made at a recorded meeting.

This is a fairly small town and to get an attorney to take this was like pulling teeth - none of them want to cross this employer, they all want to continue to work in this town. I thought I would get outside opinions. Not sure if I should let him go and just file all these claims on my own. The guy at EEOC said I would most likely get a letter stating I could sue - then that means I need a lawyer - sounds like a catch 22 to me!

I keep getting conflicting information everytime I call someone or ask questions - I have no idea what to do next. I think the employer is trying to drag things out to click away my statute of limitation time limits and most times my attorney will not return my calls - I think he is as confused as I am! :eek:

Again, thanks for the info and your time.
 

Katy W.

Member
You need to file the FLSA complaint now. You do not need a lawyer to do this.

The comments you have gotten from the EEOC about your discrimination case and inconsistent treatment, etc. do not appear to me to be appropriate , but I can't say really because you haven't posted that much about your age, etc. Your case there seems tenuous at best. In any case, the DOL is the only place you can file the FLSA claims. You have an excellent FLSA case.

Have you signed a contract with your attorney stating that he will represent you in your FLSA claim? If so, then he needs to do so now or you have every reason to rethink his part in this.

Sometimes you get employees on the phone that give you the wrong advice or misunderstand your situation. I would not hesitate to proceed with your FLSA claim due to the advice you got from the EEOC or the DOL when you called.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for giving me another perspective on this. Perhaps I should call the gentleman at EEOC again and ask for clarification. He asked me pointed questions about my situation, so I really feel he understood. Here is the jist of that conversation....

After I gave my explanation he asked me if other employees had possibly filed FLSA claims for after-hours work. I told him I didn't know for sure, but would assume so, due to the number of employees. Then he asked if those that possibly filed FLSA claims had their schedules changed as a result of their claim. I would assume that is not common practice. He then told me, since my schedule was changed as a result of FLSA issues I brought up, everyone who has filed FLSA on this employer would have to have their schedules changed in order for it not to be considered discrimination against me. He then asked my age. I'm over 40, so he said that was age discrimination as well - which makes no sense at all to me.
From the answers I have received here - I think I'll call this guy up again or maybe speak to a different person about my situation.

The thing that makes me wonder is when I spoke to a woman from the DOL, she is the one who told me to call EEOC. I told her I didn't really think it involved discrimination, and she said to call them as it sounded as though there was a possibility of discrimination. So that's 2 people from 2 different agencies.

Yes, unfortunately I have signed a contract with this attorney. He doesn't want to file with DOL yet, since we are still in negotiation with the employer. But it is going no where - in fact, every time we meet it gets more and more muddled - and one of my supervisors keeps harping on the same issues that really have no bearing on the situation. I've decided my lawyer is in over his head. We should be receiving a determination letter from the employer on the last hearing I had soon.

Should I insist that we file with DOL as soon as we get that letter stating they aren't going to pay?

At any rate - thanks so much for giving me food for thought, your opinion, and a fresh insight!
 

Katy W.

Member
I understand the EEOC angle, and if you want to should pursue that you can, of course, but your FLSA claim that you worked without getting paid can only go through the DOL or whoever takes care of FLSA claims in your state. Actually, retaliation claims have to go through that agency too, and I'm sorry, but the age discrimination thing is a stretch. The EEOC claim and the FLSA claim are completely separate.

I'm not an attorney, but I'm not seeing the legal advantage to continuing to "negotiate" with your employer. FLSA claims are fairly straightforward, you deserved to get paid and you didn't. So they have to pay you, and some states add fines. Of course your employer is going to try to muddy the waters. If they were being forthcoming and honest they would have paid you in the first place.

Anyway, the EEOC and FLSA claims are separate.

(I think you got a lonely EEOC investigator.)
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top