C
CaliCat
Guest
What is the name of your state? California
We filed a CCP 170.1(a)(6)(C) to recuse the juvenile judge with a 170.3. He responsed within a few days to simply say, "This is totally untrue, baseless, and I deny it," to only 5 of the allegations in the document. He didn't deny everything, and didn't even try to explain why he violated certain laws (the law codes we put into the document itself). The recusal was served and filed last Tuesday, we got the response Saturday.
The reason for the recusal is that he and contunually placed a child into a home he knows in dangerous, where she is, to this day, beaten on a regular basis (just yesterday TWO more investogations were opened because of the bruises on the child at the visitation center-her daddy, my boyfriend, only gets to see her two hours supervised on Sundays for trying to keep his daughter away from the people who've been convicted of molesting her before). The judge knows she is around the people who molested her and are now 290-registered offenders. He knows she has been exposed to child porn, in both print and video, that she's been exposed to drugs, including meth and crank, and so on. The judge did NOT deny this part of the recusal when we said he put her in the home despite knowing this. He can't deny putting her in the home, but he could have denied knowledge of the rest or tried to explain.
Anyway, now that we have a response, I think the next step is to file a response to his objections with the Judicial Counsel, but I'm not certain. Until the Judicial Counsel makes a determination, can the judge even make any decisions in the case? We head back to court this afternoon, so any info before then would be great, but we still need the info for later was well, so if you read this later than today, please let me know what you know.
Thank you very much.
We filed a CCP 170.1(a)(6)(C) to recuse the juvenile judge with a 170.3. He responsed within a few days to simply say, "This is totally untrue, baseless, and I deny it," to only 5 of the allegations in the document. He didn't deny everything, and didn't even try to explain why he violated certain laws (the law codes we put into the document itself). The recusal was served and filed last Tuesday, we got the response Saturday.
The reason for the recusal is that he and contunually placed a child into a home he knows in dangerous, where she is, to this day, beaten on a regular basis (just yesterday TWO more investogations were opened because of the bruises on the child at the visitation center-her daddy, my boyfriend, only gets to see her two hours supervised on Sundays for trying to keep his daughter away from the people who've been convicted of molesting her before). The judge knows she is around the people who molested her and are now 290-registered offenders. He knows she has been exposed to child porn, in both print and video, that she's been exposed to drugs, including meth and crank, and so on. The judge did NOT deny this part of the recusal when we said he put her in the home despite knowing this. He can't deny putting her in the home, but he could have denied knowledge of the rest or tried to explain.
Anyway, now that we have a response, I think the next step is to file a response to his objections with the Judicial Counsel, but I'm not certain. Until the Judicial Counsel makes a determination, can the judge even make any decisions in the case? We head back to court this afternoon, so any info before then would be great, but we still need the info for later was well, so if you read this later than today, please let me know what you know.
Thank you very much.