FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.
Having the Supreme Court rule on Mandatory vaxing in the workplace, will have no effect on Family Court judges ruling on the best interest of the child.
Having the Supreme Court rule on Mandatory vaxing in the workplace, will have no effect on Family Court judges ruling on the best interest of the child.
That would depend on exactly what the court rules in their case. If they rule that the state has no power to require a vax it would certainly create a precedence that local judges don't have the power to do so.
But that is 1) a different standard 2) not what is being considered, what is being appealed to the Supreme Court is whether the Federal government can mandate it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.