What is the name of your state?
Texas has jurisdiction. We live in Illinois.
I went to court in December. He sued for custody after I moved out of state, while I sued for changes in visitation and child suport After the hearing (I retained custody and got an increase in support), the agreement was that ex's lawyer would draft the new order. It took her almost 4 months to do so and what she produced had no resemblance to what the judge actually said. Ex's lawyer tried to insert a lot of stuff that wasn't even part of the hearing and did a lot of "creative interpretation" about what was said. In the end, my lawyer just drafted his own version of the order, and on Friday there is a hearing to get an order entered. My question is, can a judge rethink what she ordered without new testimony, or is the purpose of the hearing simply to make sure that the written order accurately reflects the verbal order made in court?
Texas has jurisdiction. We live in Illinois.
I went to court in December. He sued for custody after I moved out of state, while I sued for changes in visitation and child suport After the hearing (I retained custody and got an increase in support), the agreement was that ex's lawyer would draft the new order. It took her almost 4 months to do so and what she produced had no resemblance to what the judge actually said. Ex's lawyer tried to insert a lot of stuff that wasn't even part of the hearing and did a lot of "creative interpretation" about what was said. In the end, my lawyer just drafted his own version of the order, and on Friday there is a hearing to get an order entered. My question is, can a judge rethink what she ordered without new testimony, or is the purpose of the hearing simply to make sure that the written order accurately reflects the verbal order made in court?