Washington State. We filed a CR60 (b) (4) fraud, (5) the judgment is void, (11) other reasons, Motion May 18, 2009 in King County Superior Court alleging King County Superior Court rendered a Henak v Whitcombe Judgment No. 95 2 02783 -1SEA, that is void in multiple ways and enforcing Executive Branch corruption violating citizens Rights. With that Motion we attached our Affidavit of Prejudice and Motion for Chief Civil Judge to recuse herself, pursuant to RCW 4.12.50. She was assigned to our case automatically pursuant to LCR 60 (B). She was appointed to be a judge by the Executive Branch by a former govenor, one of the parties we named in our Motion involved in the Executive Branch government corruption. The Chief Civil Judge was placed into an obvious conflict of interest situation.
While waiting to find our if the Chief Civil Judge would recuse herslelf and if she did who the new proposed judge assigned to our case would be, a another Judge rendered his June 5, 2009 Order denyhing our CR60 Motion with stated prejudice and $5000.00 in sanctions without explanation why other than his false statement that the issues in our CR60 Motion were already tried and reviewed before by the court, Res Adjudicate, which he knows is not true because he was the Judge who rendered a February 20, 2003 nunc pro tunc Order in our case that he refers to in his Order. The second Judge assigned to our case was also appointed to be a judge by the same former governor. There are no court records showing the issues we raised in our CR60 Motion filed May 18, 2009 were ever reviewed and adjudicated before, leaving the Order baseless, false and without any 1st Amendment and 14th Amendment gurantees.
The court has provided us no record or mention of the first Judge recusing herself from our case even though we provided her an attached Proposed Order to our Motion for her to recuse herself pursuant to LCR 7 C. The Court also has provided us no record or mention of the second Judge being assigned to our case. It appears the Chief Civil Judge, having the duty to assign Judges to cases in civil proceedings knowingly violated RCW 4.12.50 Affidavit of Prejudice in assigning our case to another judge having the same conflict of interest that she recused herself from and the new judge, knowingly accepted being assigned to our case even after knowing he was appointed to be a Judge by the same former governor would be in a conflict of interest pursuant to RCW 4.12.40 (1), making the Court and Judge Doerty lacking jurisdiction to assign and try our Motion.
How can I get due course of justice in having the issues we raised in our CR60 Motion reviewed and adjudicated ? I could file another CR60 Motion to vacate the Order but to do so according to the Court Administrator I haave to file it with the judge assigned to our case who I believe lacks jurisdition.
While waiting to find our if the Chief Civil Judge would recuse herslelf and if she did who the new proposed judge assigned to our case would be, a another Judge rendered his June 5, 2009 Order denyhing our CR60 Motion with stated prejudice and $5000.00 in sanctions without explanation why other than his false statement that the issues in our CR60 Motion were already tried and reviewed before by the court, Res Adjudicate, which he knows is not true because he was the Judge who rendered a February 20, 2003 nunc pro tunc Order in our case that he refers to in his Order. The second Judge assigned to our case was also appointed to be a judge by the same former governor. There are no court records showing the issues we raised in our CR60 Motion filed May 18, 2009 were ever reviewed and adjudicated before, leaving the Order baseless, false and without any 1st Amendment and 14th Amendment gurantees.
The court has provided us no record or mention of the first Judge recusing herself from our case even though we provided her an attached Proposed Order to our Motion for her to recuse herself pursuant to LCR 7 C. The Court also has provided us no record or mention of the second Judge being assigned to our case. It appears the Chief Civil Judge, having the duty to assign Judges to cases in civil proceedings knowingly violated RCW 4.12.50 Affidavit of Prejudice in assigning our case to another judge having the same conflict of interest that she recused herself from and the new judge, knowingly accepted being assigned to our case even after knowing he was appointed to be a Judge by the same former governor would be in a conflict of interest pursuant to RCW 4.12.40 (1), making the Court and Judge Doerty lacking jurisdiction to assign and try our Motion.
How can I get due course of justice in having the issues we raised in our CR60 Motion reviewed and adjudicated ? I could file another CR60 Motion to vacate the Order but to do so according to the Court Administrator I haave to file it with the judge assigned to our case who I believe lacks jurisdition.
Last edited: