islandlites
Junior Member
What is the name of your state?What is the name of your state? New York
My 5th year anniversary with my company will occur in November 2005. Effective 90 days from date of hire, my health insurance (family coverage) commenced and has remained uninterrupted. I was advised at that time that the company's contribution to my cost would be X and I was responsible for the remaining Y. As policies changed, the company continued to contribute the same X and my Y contribution increased as the policy cost increased. This was understood and agreed to (verbally). In the recent past (6-8 months ago) a newly appointed CFO advised me privately that he found company contribution practices violated NY law in that not all employees were receiving the same company contribution of X, some are receiving less. Apparently, those on family plans received a greater company contribution than an employee on a single plan - a practice that has ensued since long prior to my date of hire - and totally unbeknownst to me personally. His promise to me then was that my salary would increase (I have not had a raise since 2003 - the only one received since date of hire) in direct relation to the new Y amount required to maintain my policy. Insurance contribution is pretax - made sense to me to accept this. While my payroll has yet to reflect this change, the insurance renewal date is this week. I was advised by the payroll clerk that the CFO needed to talk to me about my health insurance contribution - it appears that now they may just reduce the company contribution and leave me to hang for the huge increase in Y. If that as the case, I view this as a $5000 cut in my employment compensation package - cooincident with my assumption of additional responsibilities in the company. Certainly not fair - but is it legal?
My 5th year anniversary with my company will occur in November 2005. Effective 90 days from date of hire, my health insurance (family coverage) commenced and has remained uninterrupted. I was advised at that time that the company's contribution to my cost would be X and I was responsible for the remaining Y. As policies changed, the company continued to contribute the same X and my Y contribution increased as the policy cost increased. This was understood and agreed to (verbally). In the recent past (6-8 months ago) a newly appointed CFO advised me privately that he found company contribution practices violated NY law in that not all employees were receiving the same company contribution of X, some are receiving less. Apparently, those on family plans received a greater company contribution than an employee on a single plan - a practice that has ensued since long prior to my date of hire - and totally unbeknownst to me personally. His promise to me then was that my salary would increase (I have not had a raise since 2003 - the only one received since date of hire) in direct relation to the new Y amount required to maintain my policy. Insurance contribution is pretax - made sense to me to accept this. While my payroll has yet to reflect this change, the insurance renewal date is this week. I was advised by the payroll clerk that the CFO needed to talk to me about my health insurance contribution - it appears that now they may just reduce the company contribution and leave me to hang for the huge increase in Y. If that as the case, I view this as a $5000 cut in my employment compensation package - cooincident with my assumption of additional responsibilities in the company. Certainly not fair - but is it legal?