S
shan tien
Guest
What is the name of your state? Colorado
My insurance company is denying my claim because they say it was a condition I had been seen for in the last year. They got records from my doctor that I had previously been in for a UTI. So they are denying a claim for a visit I had 4 months later for lower abdominal pains. They also said that my doctor had diagnosed me with something during that visit but they won't say what. However, he told me that he found nothing. Even if he had found something, I don't see how a visit for a UTI is a pre-existing condition relating to abdominal pains, especially when he didn't find that I even had a UTI during the second visit. I asked them if they would pay it if the doctor said that they aren't related and they said no. Are they allowed to do this? Can they deny a claim based on whatever they deem to be a pre-existing condition despite what the doctor says?
I also asked if I had the flu, and then went to the doctor for the flu again 11 months later if they would refuse to pay for the second visit. They said yes. I don't understand how getting the flu twice in one year is considered pre-existing unless it happens within the same month or so. Is that really how the insurance laws work? If you get the flu in January one year and then again in November of the same year, they call it a pre-existing condition?
My insurance company is denying my claim because they say it was a condition I had been seen for in the last year. They got records from my doctor that I had previously been in for a UTI. So they are denying a claim for a visit I had 4 months later for lower abdominal pains. They also said that my doctor had diagnosed me with something during that visit but they won't say what. However, he told me that he found nothing. Even if he had found something, I don't see how a visit for a UTI is a pre-existing condition relating to abdominal pains, especially when he didn't find that I even had a UTI during the second visit. I asked them if they would pay it if the doctor said that they aren't related and they said no. Are they allowed to do this? Can they deny a claim based on whatever they deem to be a pre-existing condition despite what the doctor says?
I also asked if I had the flu, and then went to the doctor for the flu again 11 months later if they would refuse to pay for the second visit. They said yes. I don't understand how getting the flu twice in one year is considered pre-existing unless it happens within the same month or so. Is that really how the insurance laws work? If you get the flu in January one year and then again in November of the same year, they call it a pre-existing condition?