[email protected]
Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Missouri
Sorry, I posted this in the wrong forum (real estate) and I was told to post my question here. So, here goes.....
Missouri
I have very unusual situation, my FIL died, left house to children, but with a life estate (possessory interest for his tramp second wife, who was over 20 years younger) allowing her to live in house until her death or her choosing, providing that house was maintained up to existing codes and standards, real estate taxes were paid on the house and that she keep the property insured with coverage acceptable to the remaindermen.
The witch has purchased insurance not suitable to the children, coverage was too low ($80,000 replacement instead of rebuild cost of at least $250,000). The children were not listed as the beneficiaries as specifically directed in the will**************
My question is: since the heirs paid for an insurance policy (with proper coverage), can they use a "right to cure" for the purpose of evicting this gold-digger. By the way, she was left a nice 3 bedroom lake house, with extra lot and 2 slip dock and swimming platform. She also own a 3 bedroom condominium free and clear. Any help will be appreciated.
Thank you!
Sorry, I posted this in the wrong forum (real estate) and I was told to post my question here. So, here goes.....
Missouri
I have very unusual situation, my FIL died, left house to children, but with a life estate (possessory interest for his tramp second wife, who was over 20 years younger) allowing her to live in house until her death or her choosing, providing that house was maintained up to existing codes and standards, real estate taxes were paid on the house and that she keep the property insured with coverage acceptable to the remaindermen.
The witch has purchased insurance not suitable to the children, coverage was too low ($80,000 replacement instead of rebuild cost of at least $250,000). The children were not listed as the beneficiaries as specifically directed in the will**************
My question is: since the heirs paid for an insurance policy (with proper coverage), can they use a "right to cure" for the purpose of evicting this gold-digger. By the way, she was left a nice 3 bedroom lake house, with extra lot and 2 slip dock and swimming platform. She also own a 3 bedroom condominium free and clear. Any help will be appreciated.
Thank you!