T
TeresaT100
Guest
California:
I am so frustrated, and tired of attorney's giving me conflicting
useless information.
My ex filed bankruptcy (which he lied about assets, 15,000 worth, and
the disposal of assets thereof as well) I did not file bankruptcy. He
ultimately did so to try to force me to lose or sell the house I owned
prior to being married to him. (Which was quit claimed 1/2 interest to
him in 84) This didn't work, he ended up interspousal transferring an
upside down mortgaged house over to me. I have not filed bankruptcy but
have to assume approx. $15,000 in the debts that were ours jointly. My
ex sold approx. $5,000 worth of assets without my permission. We only
have approx. $11,000. worth of assets free and clear left (of which my
father is a third party-owner on approx. $8,000.worth)
The problem I have conflicting information on is this:
Doesn't the Debt of the community property come into play as well as the
assets? It seems that if one party skates on obligations to pay debts by
B.K. but expects the assets too, while the other party pays, puts a
unfair disadvantage to one party.
Please clarify and cite a family code if you could, I am very concerned
by this and can't get clear answers
I am so frustrated, and tired of attorney's giving me conflicting
useless information.
My ex filed bankruptcy (which he lied about assets, 15,000 worth, and
the disposal of assets thereof as well) I did not file bankruptcy. He
ultimately did so to try to force me to lose or sell the house I owned
prior to being married to him. (Which was quit claimed 1/2 interest to
him in 84) This didn't work, he ended up interspousal transferring an
upside down mortgaged house over to me. I have not filed bankruptcy but
have to assume approx. $15,000 in the debts that were ours jointly. My
ex sold approx. $5,000 worth of assets without my permission. We only
have approx. $11,000. worth of assets free and clear left (of which my
father is a third party-owner on approx. $8,000.worth)
The problem I have conflicting information on is this:
Doesn't the Debt of the community property come into play as well as the
assets? It seems that if one party skates on obligations to pay debts by
B.K. but expects the assets too, while the other party pays, puts a
unfair disadvantage to one party.
Please clarify and cite a family code if you could, I am very concerned
by this and can't get clear answers